Back to @JavierBlas's profile

Javier Blas engagement report

@JavierBlas - 398K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 398K followers
Per impression
0.705%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
9.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
276
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 398K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iran, #تنگه_هرمز.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #iran, #تنگه_هرمز.

Compared with accounts its own size

Javier Blas's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Javier Blas sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 6, 202220x their median

    This week, The World for Sale comes out in paperback It explains how oil and commodity markets work, how they influence geopolitics, and the extraordinary power of a few traders you've probably never heard of Please take a look https://t.co/NZoL8VdgHs https://t.co/5C0ooRQL20

    4.2K711392162View on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.4x their median

    TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne nails it, warning that some emerging nations are “losing trust” on LNG after two back-to-back price shocks (2022 and 2026). The result? “Back to coal.”

    9631824637144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.9x their median

    According to @fbirol, the three biggest drivers of global electricity demand worldwide are (in order of importance): 1) Air conditioning 2) Data centres 3) Electric vehicles (Quite a difference on what’s driving demand in reality and what is talked about)

    859159501578K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.2x their median

    As the US-Iran conflict moves full into economic war fare, a reminder the US benchmark natural gas price is ~$2.7 per mBtu (it’s >$22 in Europe / Asia). Adjusted by cumulative inflation, the American industry is enjoying one of the lowest natural gas prices ever.

    705117282171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    Japan plans to support the construction of pipelines bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. (The biggest step would be when — rather than if — Japan diversifies away from Middle East oil, which pre-war was >90% of its imports. Winner: US shale and Latam oil) https://t.co/8TxCyaC74D

    45286231765K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.8x their median

    If you find yourself in south-west Norway, the petroleum museum in Stavanger (Norsk Oljemuseum) is well worth a visit. https://t.co/DGsgHRp7lW

    4631515336K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne describes the supply and demand fundamentals for crude oil — emphasis on crude — as “completely bearish.” But he warns the real oil shortage is in petroleum refined products, saying the outlook for diesel is “very bullish.”

    40452178112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.6x their median

    US President Trump says Washington planning to use Venezuelan crude to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Unclear what terms, if any, have been agreed. https://t.co/0S2ItSVqLq

    27434119979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.5x their median

    ♦️ قالیباف: 🔹 ما هر چقدر قدرت نظامی داشته باشیم ولی اگر مردم گرسنه باشند و گردش مالی و رشد اقتصادی نداشته باشیم، دوام نمی‌آوریم 🔹 امنیت و اقتصاد لازم و ملزوم یکدیگر هستند؛ اگر امنیت را برقرار کنیم و تداومش را با اقتصاد پیش نبریم پایدار نخواهد بود 🔹 ما به عنوان یک رزمنده، بیش از آنهایی که حرف از صلح می‌زنند، قدر صلح را می‌دانیم

    30528682051K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    COLUMN: US President Trump is betting he can break Iran economically and, in the process, achieve the concessions he wants. But historical precedent suggests he’s wrong. Yet, running short of options, economic warfare is probably the least bad plan. https://t.co/3LZSgFe0MX

    2814850738K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#iran#تنگه_هرمز

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 398K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.705% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iran, #تنگه_هرمز.

What is Javier Blas's engagement rate on X?
Javier Blas (@JavierBlas) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 398,072 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Javier Blas sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JavierBlas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JavierBlas post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Javier Blas (@JavierBlas) Engagement Rate - 0.07% | PlayerSells