Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 engagement report
@JasonJournoDC - 141K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 493 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 81% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 72x its own typical post.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.35%, Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 160,367 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.606%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.606% |
| 90th percentile | 2.33% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 684 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 30, 202672x their median
💥NEW: John Fetterman and Greta Van Susteren share personal stories showing Trump's character🇺🇸 Fetterman: "He even checked in on my dad! My dad's having a real difficult situation health about his heart — and he absolutely checked in on that." Van Susteren: "A lot of people don't see that side of Trump." "Years ago — before he even ran for president — I was covering a story of this down-and-out soldier who had PTSD. And I got a call from Trump asking me what his address was." "I said, 'I don't know his address. Why?' He said, 'Because I want to help the guy.' And I said, 'Well, I don't know.'" "He said, 'I’ll tell you what, I'll send you a check — and you find him.'" "So he hangs up the phone — and the next day I get a FedEx from Donald Trump with a personal check to the guy for $25,000!" This is the side of Trump the media doesn't want you to hear about. They want you to think he is a monster. But these stories reveal how caring and generous he is. The real test of someone's character is what he does when nobody is watching.
- Aug 31, 202633x their median
💥NEW: Stephen A. Smith: "I have had 60 guests on the show: 30 Republicans, 30 Democrats. Who hasn't shown up? Jasmine Crockett, AOC, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris. But they on other podcasts though!" These Democrat "leaders" are scared to go anywhere they'd receive the slightest bit of pushback. As Smith says, it's not like they don't go on other shows. They just only go on with sycophants and Democrat shills. It's pathetic.
- Sep 19, 202619x their median
Just days before his death, @ScottAdamsSays predicted Trump would acquire Greenland 🇺🇸🇬🇱 Scott argued Trump had "clearly moved out of the 'wanting' phase" and "into the 'deciding' phase." He predicted Trump would "almost certainly" acquire Greenland within 3 years, but noted there was "a good chance" the president could do it within 6 months because of how fast he moves. Trump announced yesterday that America had reached a deal for "permanent" security and military rights in Greenland. The fact that Scott made this prediction in his dying days makes it even more impressive. I think Scott is looking down with pride now about his prediction. https://t.co/K8bZMK9dD7
- Sep 15, 202617x their median
1 year ago today, @ScottAdamsSays completely changed my life 💯 During the 9/15/2025 edition of Coffee With Scott Adams, he said: "Jason Cohen is a great follow on 𝕏 ... you probably want to follow him if you want to know the latest." New followers flooded in by the thousands because they trusted Scott so much 🚀 They are all such awesome people. I’m blessed to have them on board. I still can’t believe Scott did this for me. It was a dream come true. I had been a fan of his for years. His show, books, speeches, interviews and videos entertained me and helped me improve myself. It was an honor and a privilege that I got to be part of his world before he passed on to the next one. RIP Scott Adams — and thank you again for being such an influential legend 🙏 https://t.co/xM29JR6pmu
- Jan 12, 202613x their median
2024. DONALD TRUMP: “Jason Cohen, the @DailyCaller — respected."🤯 2025. @ScottAdamsSays: “Jason Cohen is a great follow on X ... You probably want to follow him if you want to know the latest.”🔥 2026. Stay tuned👀 Grateful for these moments🙏Hard to top — but I'll try🚀💯 https://t.co/b91WGAu4b1
- Aug 27, 20268.1x their median
💥NEW: John Bolton tells hilarious Trump story from first term🤣 "I was in the Oval Office one day and I walked in to tell him something. And Trump was in the middle of dictating a tweet to Dan Scavino." "And he turns to Scavino at one point and says, 'Capitalize every word in that last sentence.'" "And then he turns to me and he said, 'You know why I do that?' And I said, 'No, why?'" "And he said, 'Because it drives them crazy.'" "And that's what Trump is doing to Canada." "Lake America — forget Lake Ontario. He's trolling them!" Trump is a master troll. 😂🇺🇸 Nearly half of Lake America is in the U.S. The deepest part of the lake is also in America. So in addition to being funny, the name change is justified. The reactions to Lake America have been amazing. The Left takes the bait every time.
- Sep 23, 20267.2x their median
💥NEW: CNN's David Axelrod just admitted what few Democrats are willing to acknowledge: Trump is "VERY SOPHISTICATED." Axelrod noted Trump commandeered the news cycle with his ban against CNN, MS NOW, and Politico. So many shows devoted significant time to the president's press ban. Instead of discussing gas prices and other issues to hurt Trump, they fell right into his trap. Trump also picked the perfect target for his news cycle hijacking operation: the media. Americans' trust in the media hit a record low of just 28% in 2025, according to Gallup. It's not just Trump supporters who have lost faith in the media either. Republicans, Independents, and Democrats all have historically low trust in the institution. "Very sophisticated" may even be an understatement from Axelrod. Trump is a genius.
- Sep 14, 20265.5x their median
💥Alan Dershowitz: "Birthright citizenship is the DUMBEST constitutional right that ANY constitutional author EVER put in a Constitution! It's STUPID!" "It's RIDICULOUS! And I support the president COMPLETELY in his effort to try to limit it!" I didn't post this clip until now because I couldn't come up with original commentary for it. I wholeheartedly agreed with Dershowitz here, but I didn't have anything unique to add. I worked hard to add quality commentary to all the clips I posted in order to adhere to the Original Content Rewards program guidelines. Yet I was rejected anyway. Enjoy this epic Dershowitz clip! And thank you for your support 🙏
- Aug 31, 20265.0x their median
💥NEW: Stephen A. Smith *BLASTS* Barack Obama💥 "What I never told y'all and I never brought up is that Barack Obama called me ... before the election to discuss my impact." "But he didn't come on the podcast either ... It was after I said that we need a new president 'cause Joe Biden clearly was done." "Folks like to talk to me privately — but then when I ask them to come on camera … they go elsewhere." It sounds like Obama recognizes Smith's power enough to try to influence him behind the scenes before an election. But he still won't grace Smith with an interview. Even though Bill Maher donated $1 million to Obama, he had to beg him before finally getting an interview in 2016. Why does Obama seem so scared of interviews with independent thinkers? Maybe it's because his ideas and record don't hold up to scrutiny.
- Sep 22, 20263.1x their median
In honor of Trump and Mamdani meeting again yesterday, here's @ScottAdamsSays' Persuasion Lesson on their first meeting in Nov. 2025. Scott said Trump made himself even more “interesting” than Mamdani during their Oval Office meeting. He said this was a remarkable achievement given Mamdani's persuasion skill and how hot he was at the time. Scott argued Trump was the only politician who could have pulled this off. He reveled in Trump's performance, saying the president "just totally owned it." Scott's persuasion lessons were epic. He was incredible at blending education and entertainment. And no one understood Trump better. So grateful for all of the good times and wisdom Scott bestowed upon us 🙏 https://t.co/f3cUNvuxFk
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 493 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.35%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 81% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 72x its own typical post.
- What is Jason Cohen 🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
- Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) has an engagement rate of 0.35%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 141,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.35%, Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 160,367 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JasonJournoDC have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JasonJournoDC post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.