Janice Dean engagement report
@JaniceDean - 637K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 637K followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 7.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #closetforacause, #nursinghomewarrior, #fashionfinds.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #closetforacause, #nursinghomewarrior, #fashionfinds.
Compared with accounts its own size
Janice Dean's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.303%, Janice Dean sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 154.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 56K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 45K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 82K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 103K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 84K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 78K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 239K |
| Monday | 0% | 303K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 305K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 259K |
| Thursday | -2% | 251K |
| Friday | -3% | 260K |
| Saturday | +3% | 234K |
Best tweets
- Aug 18, 202612x their median
For what it’s worth…I had my first baby at age 35 because I had only met and married my husband a few years before. We didn’t have an amnio because I wouldn’t have aborted regardless. So my obgyn at the time wanted me to take a (notoriously unreliable) blood test instead which I did. Results came back saying there was an extremely high chance the baby would have DS. Whatever. He was born and he didn’t have DS. During the first few months of his life I kept having weird ideations of violent things happening to him. I had enough knowledge to realize it was a hormonal thing. I asked for prayer in my mom’s group to deal with it. It eventually subsided. I subsequently had three more babies - I was 40 years old at the time of my fourth pregnancy. Still no amnio and also no more blood tests. Just to say that the hormonal thing is real, and conceiving at a later age is a blessing. Also, if you want marriage and children in your future, it makes sense to prioritize (along with your caree) finding a suitable husband as early as possible.
- Aug 18, 20263.0x their median
Me and Lola. ☀️ https://t.co/mZWmcC6vzS
- Aug 22, 20262.9x their median
Trying to figure out if I let the grey grow in? https://t.co/fNjuqKAD59
- Aug 19, 20262.6x their median
I just clicked on an article I wanted to read, and there was a paywall. And then I just didn’t care anymore…lol.
- Aug 22, 20262.2x their median
My husband took me to see The Glenn Miller Orchestra, and it was so wonderful I had to post some video. They perform almost 200 dates (or more) a year, so if you get the chance, go see them. Definitely a highlight of the year. The music is timeless and will bring you joy. ❤️ https://t.co/ILljLhoRat
- Aug 24, 20261.7x their median
Another controversial topic: I dislike pumpkin flavoring in anything.
- Aug 19, 20261.7x their median
I’m still trying to figure out why the same drug I was taking on my previous insurance was over 3 grand every month (I had to call to get the drug company to help pay it), and now under my husband’s insurance it’s next to nothing. Can someone explain this like I’m 5 years old?
- Aug 25, 2026
God Bless Dolly Parton. We were blessed to have her. RIP to an angel. https://t.co/tbwflhQRxk
- Aug 13, 2026
They say getting rid of the clothes from a previous life can be very freeing. And the best part is all the proceeds will go to a nursing home charity. September 1st at The Harrison restaurant (Long Island) I’ll Post a link to register next week! #ClosetforaCause 💜 https://t.co/cRQPm8ov0S
- Aug 16, 2026
Enjoying these last few weeks of summer. https://t.co/6YvRmmEhcp
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 637K followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 7.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #closetforacause, #nursinghomewarrior, #fashionfinds.
- What is Janice Dean's engagement rate on X?
- Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) has an engagement rate of 0.303%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 637,203 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.303%, Janice Dean sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JaniceDean have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JaniceDean post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.