Back to @JaniceDean's profile

Janice Dean engagement report

@JaniceDean - 641K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.423%
of 641K followers
Per impression
8.20%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
5.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.423%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 8.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #neverforget, #andrewcuomoisawful, #bloodmoney.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #neverforget, #andrewcuomoisawful, #bloodmoney.

Compared with accounts its own size

Janice Dean's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.423%, Janice Dean sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 212 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 20268.6x their median

    For what it’s worth…I had my first baby at age 35 because I had only met and married my husband a few years before. We didn’t have an amnio because I wouldn’t have aborted regardless. So my obgyn at the time wanted me to take a (notoriously unreliable) blood test instead which I did. Results came back saying there was an extremely high chance the baby would have DS. Whatever. He was born and he didn’t have DS. During the first few months of his life I kept having weird ideations of violent things happening to him. I had enough knowledge to realize it was a hormonal thing. I asked for prayer in my mom’s group to deal with it. It eventually subsided. I subsequently had three more babies - I was 40 years old at the time of my fourth pregnancy. Still no amnio and also no more blood tests. Just to say that the hormonal thing is real, and conceiving at a later age is a blessing. Also, if you want marriage and children in your future, it makes sense to prioritize (along with your caree) finding a suitable husband as early as possible.

    21K1.1K57843634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.8x their median

    Twelve firefighters who were working in my husband's firehouse died on 9/11. The "riding list," handwritten in chalk shows all the men who were on duty that day. It still hangs on the firehouse wall, forever preserved in glass. Engine 40 Ladder 35 #NeverForget911 @FDNY Captain Frank Callahan, Kevin Bracken, Michael D'Auria, Lieutenant John Ginley, Steve Mercado, Michael Roberts, Michael Otten, Jimmy Giberson, Dan Marshall, Bruce Gary, Michael Lynch, Vincent Morello.

    17K1.6K12621303K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.1x their median

    To gray or not to gray? I wrote about thinking of letting my hair grow naturally. (Second picture is AI) https://t.co/bo67v2bMIs

    5.3K1752.9K92168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.1x their median

    Honestly what is there to laugh about as names of dead people are being read?

    7.6K5802682344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.9x their median

    God bless the @fdny 🇺🇸 https://t.co/yeAbQ3BbYV

    7.3K419891137K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.7x their median

    My husband carries survivor’s guilt about why he was spared on 9/11 when others in his firehouse were not. That guilt is something he will live with for the rest of his life, and the feeling overwhelms him when the weather starts to get cooler and the school year approaches. Our kids know their dad is a fireman, but they have no idea the profound story and history he has lived through. https://t.co/I5FSibo1F8

    6.5K6252051380K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.6x their median

    When I saw the wives standing at the ceremony yesterday listening for their husband’s name to be called, I witnessed their incredible strength and resilience. These brave women managed to keep going despite their unimaginable loss. They are heroes too. https://t.co/c1TDYQdDIx

    6.5K46932231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.6x their median

    It’s been tough seeing people I trust let me down. There were signs the last few years that I chose to ignore. But, I know that God is protecting me from a path that would’ve crushed my spirit and made me sick had I continued to stay. Grateful for my blessings. https://t.co/wIdpDzTW0m

    5.9K5723802490K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.5x their median

    My husband is an FDNY survivor of 9/11. Sean rarely talks about his experience, but on this 25th anniversary, he gave me his blessing to write about it. God bless the heroes and their families. https://t.co/kUA6u9AMnu

    5.8K8131111383K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.5x their median

    Thank you for reading my posts. Thank you for checking in. Thank you for everything. I appreciate all of you. And now, a break. Love, JD

    6.3K233176445K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#neverforget#andrewcuomoisawful#bloodmoney#neverforget911#newprofilepic

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 641K followers, an engagement rate of 0.423%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 8.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #neverforget, #andrewcuomoisawful, #bloodmoney.

What is Janice Dean's engagement rate on X?
Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) has an engagement rate of 0.423%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 640,595 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.423%, Janice Dean sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JaniceDean have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JaniceDean post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going