Jan Lipavský engagement report
@JanLipavsky - 111K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 371 interactions against 111K followers, an engagement rate of 0.335%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 4.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jan Lipavský's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.335%, Jan Lipavský sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 52% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 285 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 29, 20265.8x their median
V rámci operace Vivaldi Ukrajina získala na Donbase zpět 176 km² svého území. Rusko lze porazit. Evropu lze ubránit.
- Sep 30, 20264.6x their median
Putin na rok 2027 chystá navýšení rozpočtu na obranu o 27 % oproti původnímu plánu. Ne a ne vyslyšet volání po míru z úst Andreje Babiše.
- Oct 1, 20264.2x their median
Rád bych se ministra obrany České republiky zeptal, jaký má postoj k oficiální pozici summitu NATO všech členských států aliance, tedy že Čína je nejvýznamnějším sponzorem ruské války proti Ukrajině. https://t.co/nZPRmS3BWC
- Sep 29, 20262.6x their median
Estonský ministr zahraničí Margus Tsahkna oznámil, že srpnový žhářský útok na prostory firmy Milrem Robotics byl sabotáží nařízenou ruskými tajnými službami. Podezřelí byli zadrženi a Estonsko si kvůli útoku předvolává ruského chargé d’affaires. Je to další z kroků ruské války proti Evropě. Rusko zastavíme jedině silou, ne prázdnými slovy.
- Sep 28, 20262.6x their median
Dnešní ruské útoky na Ukrajinu jsou hanebné, odporné a necivilizované. Zasáhly obytné domy i budovu Národní akademie věd v centru Kyjeva. Umírali lidé, desítky dalších byly zraněny, mezi nimi děti. Rusko musí být poraženo, aby nemohlo dál útočit na Evropu.
- Sep 26, 20262.6x their median
Co musí udělat Andrej Babiš pro zvýšení bezpečnosti?👇 1.Zvýšení výdajů na obranu: Postupně navyšovat výdaje až k 3,5 % HDP. 2.Darování letounů Ukrajině: Poskytnout čtyři letouny L-159, aby nehnily v hangárech, ale pomohly sestřelovat drony. 3.Omezení pohybu ruských diplomatů: Zamezit jim ve volném cestování na schengenská víza. 4.Schůzka k bezpečnosti: Svolat setkání předsedů poslaneckých stran, aby se táhlo za jeden provaz. 5.Obnovení vládního STRATKOMu: Lépe se bránit ruské informační válce, protože teď jsme „nazí v trní“. 6.Připojení k protiraketovému štítu: Zapojit se do iniciativy prezidentů Zelenského a Macrona místo vlastních iniciativ. 7.Jmenování poradce: Dosadit klíčovou postavu poradce pro národní bezpečnost přímo k premiérovi. 8.Bonus: Přestat citovat Alberta Einsteina.
- Sep 27, 20262.4x their median
Andrej Babiš má hlad. Bude zvyšovat daně.
- Sep 30, 20262.3x their median
Včera ruské letectvo shodilo čtvrttunovou bombu přímo na školu v severoukrajinských Sumách. Na stovku dětí se naštěstí stihlo ukrýt v bunkru a přežilo. V té souvislosti jsem si vzpomněl na jeden z humanitárních projektů, které díky vládě Petra Fialy realizovalo Česko na Ukrajině. V obci Borysivka byl postaven kryt pro 120 dětí v místní škole. Ukrajinci si zvlášť za války uvědomují, co je pro ně nejcennější: životy malých dětí, jejich budoucnost a vzdělání. Česko jim pomáhalo to nejcennější chránit a získávalo tím ohromnou prestiž. Babišova vláda bohužel všechny tyto humanitární programy pyšně zastavila. O míru se hezky mluví, ale před ruskými bombami chrání děti kryty a silná protiletadlová obrana. Česko přitom na Ukrajině rezignovalo na obojí.
- Sep 25, 20262.2x their median
Diktátor Putin si začíná brousit zuby na Litvu.
- Sep 30, 2026
V Praze je nová krásná lanovka na Petřín, opravený Barrandovský most, kope se nové Déčko, pokračuje výstavba okruhu a konečně rostou nové čtvrti. Po 20 letech má Průmyslový palác zase dvě křídla. Přesto se kandidáti na primátora, s čestnou výjimkou Tomáše Portlíka 🩵, můžou přetrhnout, aby si kopli do pana primátora Bohuslava Svobody. Pokrytectví. Díky SPOLU (ODS a TOP 09) je nám v Praze líp.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 371 interactions against 111K followers, an engagement rate of 0.335%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 4.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
- What is Jan Lipavský's engagement rate on X?
- Jan Lipavský (@JanLipavsky) has an engagement rate of 0.335%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 110,926 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.335%, Jan Lipavský sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JanLipavsky have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JanLipavsky post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.