Jan Nieuwenhuijs engagement report
@JanGold_ - 181K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 64x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gold, #programmablemoney, #tokeniseddeposits.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #gold, #programmablemoney, #tokeniseddeposits.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jan Nieuwenhuijs's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.081%, Jan Nieuwenhuijs sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 47% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 37% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 37% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 181 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Dec 24, 202364x their median
On July 7, 1971, Paul Volcker arrived in The Netherlands to tell then President of the Dutch central bank, Jelle Zijlstra, to cancel a request for converting $250 million dollars into gold. Zijlstra said he would not cancel the request because he only held on to dollars as working stock, to which Volcker said: “You are rocking the boat.” Zijlstra replied that if a conversion of $250 million dollars rocks the boat, that boat has already sunk. On August 15, 1971, the US suspended dollar conversion into gold altogether.
- Sep 24, 202641x their median
Big news: Quant is partnering with @TCHtweets to bring on-chain, #programmablemoney to the US. We will provide the interoperability layer that lets #tokeniseddeposits move freely within the regulated banking system. This builds on our work in the UK, Europe and beyond. Read the press release here: https://t.co/OQJXzfN3lr or the blog here: https://t.co/Y39YiIAZD6 #OnChainMoneyInitiative
- Sep 27, 202612x their median
Start learning about ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675: https://t.co/hOBUV7NH1S https://t.co/17x71ed4Pq https://t.co/hmGFA9BFn9 https://t.co/57sF0N6ggr
- Sep 15, 20269.0x their median
Physical oil bidding in North Sea (what prices everything ex US) is back in panic mode. Physical to paper blows out again - as it did in April. This is not a healthy market. All it needs is some Chinese Teapots bidding and a few Aramco delays and everything blows up - from physical oil price to diffs to freight rates to diesel cracks to whatever - everything cracks..!
- Sep 8, 20264.3x their median
Spot the little gold trick by the US and the Dutch National Bank Quote 1: Between March and August 2026, approximately 86 tonnes of gold were transferred from the combined total of approximately 313 tonnes held in the United States and Canada to London Quote 2: The relocation was largely effected by first selling approximately 59 tonnes of gold in New York and then buying gold in London that meets the international market standards. In addition, more than 27 tonnes of gold were physically transferred from the United States and Canada to Zeist, and a similar quantity of gold that meets the international market standards was transferred from Zeist to London https://t.co/mPkw4nCSKB
- Sep 3, 20261.7x their median
The name of the game is gold, nukes, and oil
- Sep 5, 2026
Dutch Financieel Dagblad thinks all the remaining Dutch DNB gold needs to be removed from US and Canada and brought closer to home. https://t.co/I9iprTnc7f https://t.co/EoJGyW4Cbq
- Aug 30, 2026
You want to learn how the gold market works? REPOST: The Mechanics of the Global Gold Market https://t.co/Tbwhn8DzI8
- Sep 4, 2026
“Some of the world’s biggest money managers have rebuilt their gold holdings after prices dropped, betting that long-term drivers of the precious metal will endure even as the US Federal Reserve takes a more assertive stance on inflation.” https://t.co/n02zzqhrgK
- Sep 6, 2026
The GDDI: Grok De-Dollarization Index It’s going up: de-dollarization is real. https://t.co/VwQbpBsBQm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 64x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gold, #programmablemoney, #tokeniseddeposits.
- What is Jan Nieuwenhuijs's engagement rate on X?
- Jan Nieuwenhuijs (@JanGold_) has an engagement rate of 0.081%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,521 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.081%, Jan Nieuwenhuijs sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JanGold_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JanGold_ post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.