Back to @JamesTate121's profile

James Tate engagement report

@JamesTate121 - 143K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.651%
of 143K followers
Per impression
2.64%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
24.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
929
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 929 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.651%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

James Tate's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.651%, James Tate sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202624x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Jewish actor Daniel Radcliffe: "As a Jew, I was fed lies about Israel my entire life." "They never told me that Palestinians lived there. Israel is absurd and nonsensical, built on ethnic cleansing and genocide." https://t.co/JY6ZeNflPh

    19K3.2K412881.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202619x their median

    McGowan: I watch Fox News talking about communism, communism, communism. Every single one of them got dressed up to go to that dinner. I see the Republican representatives doing it. I see the supreme court justices at that dinner. https://t.co/QMWePL4ech

    14K3.3K27076421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202616x their median

    I did not know this About tattoos 😳😳 https://t.co/5PyCgB2tsi

    10K4.1K482359737K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.7x their median

    I live in Florida and it's gonna suck having to vote for Byron Donalds for governor. So I'll just have to hold my nose and vote for him because there's no way in hell I'll ever vote for a Democrat. I'm gonna miss Ron DeSantis a lot, the greatest governor Florida ever had!

    5.8K3361.0K53166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.7x their median

    Window into the soul: Capturing the wretchedness of two people who have no business living in the People's House, this image of Trump and Melania is disturbing as fuck. https://t.co/G6uqzioEpZ

    5.5K1.3K3006177K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.6x their median

    Miriam Adelson’s Israeli-American Council (IAC) is protesting outside the New York Film Festival premiere of “NAZA”, a documentary by Israelis who chronicled Israel’s genocide in Gaza. https://t.co/7STyoz0uRM

    945387862564K viewsView on X
  • Mar 31, 2026

    🚨BREAKING: President Trump suggests conflict with Iran will be over soon: "I think 2-3 weeks". https://t.co/0R0gxf1h5O

    545597824209K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    MAGA: When I got the benefits it was different... https://t.co/8Itwszub4c

    2741122186.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    15😼 https://t.co/DO1evWY7Qw

    1502015776.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    I bet you’ve never read this. Manafort is a known Russian asset who owed Oleg Deripaska tens of millions when he started working for the Trump campaign for free. Stone was the conduit for the Trump campaign and Wikileaks who was friends with Allison Guerriero,the woman who committed suicide recently that was the mistress of Charles McGonigal. Allison called Sergei Millian, another Russian asset the night before she died and discussed Me. She had targeted me last year for exposing her best friends. They include, Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Caputo, Mike Flynn, Ken Kurson, and more. It doesn’t take much logic to see exactly what has transpired.

    199111943.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 929 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.651%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is James Tate's engagement rate on X?
James Tate (@JamesTate121) has an engagement rate of 0.651%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,094 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.651%, James Tate sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JamesTate121 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JamesTate121 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going