Back to @Jam79922967's profile

Petrichor engagement report

@Jam79922967 - 658K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 658K followers
Per impression
0.547%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 658K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.547% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 998 interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Petrichor's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Petrichor sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20268.3x their median

    你的劣祖劣宗没有给你留下什么优良的东西。融入世界文明才是正道。 https://t.co/kOsup0nbx8

    76515973143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.2x their median

    广西宁明县发生特大洪灾。人民生命财产遭受重大损失,然而央视没有报道。网友说国籍搞错了,如果是美国宁明县,央视会持续报道的。 https://t.co/1l6LRkVdsR

    3778937423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.0x their median

    这两马指挥的马家军消灭了中共西路军,导致西路军整建制21800人在河西走廊全军覆灭。其中战死者7000多人,被俘12000多人。被俘後惨遭杀害者6000多人,回到家乡者3000多人,经营救回到延安者4500多人,流落西北各地者1000多人。内中被俘2000多名女战士的遭遇尤其悲惨,大部分被奸污後或遭残杀或转配他人或流落异乡,受尽人间苦难。被杀6000多人中,有3267人在张掖死难:2609人被活埋,575人被枪杀,36人被烧死,27人被扒心、挑喉、割舌、断筋致死。

    321391114130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.1x their median

    “人类与动物的核心区别在于,后者绝不会允许群体中最愚蠢的那一个来领导它们” 温斯顿·丘吉尔

    3143815222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    这才是真实的中国 https://t.co/JpIawAi4CN

    216156050K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    毛泽东的老照片,从中可以看出他的为人 https://t.co/hEiLsJItCM

    14716442147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    这两个人,其中一个投降日本,成最大汉奸;另一个领导人民坚决抗日,赢得抗日战争,却败于苏联武装起来黄俄党。 https://t.co/cAJ7yj8Aqh

    136565123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.7x their median

    只是中共制度几乎唯一的原创发明 https://t.co/R8DuUSVPG2

    1312052324K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.5x their median

    国民政府败退台湾前各部门负责人学历统计表: 中央银行总裁:刘攻芸--伦敦经济学院博士 行政院长:翁文灏 --比利时鲁文大学博士 外交部长:王世杰--伦敦大学经济博士,巴黎大学法学博士 教育部长:朱家骅---柏林大学博士 司法部长:谢冠生--巴黎大学法学博士 交通部长:俞大维—哈佛大学博士 社会部长:谷正纲—柏林大学博士 卫生部长:周诒春—耶鲁大学硕士 粮食部长:关吉玉—柏林大学博士 考试院长:张伯苓—哥伦比亚大学毕业,芝加哥大学名誉博士 司法部长:王庞惠—耶鲁大学博士 立法院长:孙科—哥伦比亚大学硕士 最高法院院长:谢赢洲—巴黎大学法学博士 内政部长:张厉生—巴黎大学 财政部长:俞鸿钧—上海圣约翰大学 经济部长:李璜—巴黎大学文科硕士 农林部长:左舜生—上海震旦大学 侨务委员会委员长:陈树人—东京立教大学 善后救济总署长:蒋廷黻—哥伦比亚大学历史博士 新闻局长:董显光—哥伦比亚大学普利策新闻学院硕士(肄业,母危回国) 1948年国民政府驻外大使学历(不完全): 苏联:傅秉常—香港大学名誉法学博士 美国:顾维钧—哥伦比亚大学哲学博士 英国:郑天锡—伦敦大学法学博士 法国:钱泰—巴黎法科大學法學博士 印度:罗家伦—北京大学(曾游学于普林斯顿大学、哥伦比亚大学、伦敦大学、柏林大学、巴黎大学) 土耳其:李迪俊—美国威斯康辛大学政治学博士 伊朗:郑亦同—爱丁堡大学 伊拉克:李金发—巴黎帝国美术学校 缅甸:涂允檀—美国伊利诺大学政治学博士 泰国:李铁铮—哥伦比亚大学政治学博士,伦敦大学国际关系学院哲学博士 菲律宾:陈质平—东南大学 韩国:刘驭万——美国威斯康辛大学政治学硕士 阿富汗:许念曾—巴黎法科大学政治经济学博士 挪威:金问泗—哥伦比亚大法学硕士 瑞典:谢维麟—巴黎大学法学硕士 荷兰:张谦—宾夕法尼亚大学法律系学士 墨西哥:冯执正—哥伦比亚大学 (肆业) 巴西:郭泰祺—宾夕法尼亚大学政治学博士 智利:吴泽湘—伦敦大学经济学学士 玻利维亚:保君建—哥伦比亚大学博士 阿根廷:陈介—东京帝国大学,德国柏林大学法律经济系 埃及:何凤山—慕尼黑大学政治经济学博士 澳大利亚:甘乃光—芝加哥大学研究生 常驻联合国代表:蒋廷黻—哥伦比亚大学历史博士

    892864126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    蒋介石的身份证 https://t.co/v8JUaQPRvA

    1221933122K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 658K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.547% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 998 interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post.

What is Petrichor's engagement rate on X?
Petrichor (@Jam79922967) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 658,172 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Petrichor sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Jam79922967 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Jam79922967 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going