Jakub Szántó engagement report
@JakubSzanto - 108K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 259 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.24%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #freegao, #gaozhisheng, #whereisgaozhisheng.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #freegao, #gaozhisheng, #whereisgaozhisheng.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jakub Szántó's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.24%, Jakub Szántó sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 52% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 52% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 357 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 10, 202610x their median
İran Eski Dışişleri Bakanı Cevad Zarif'in sansürsüz yaptığı konuşmada anlattıkları, tartışmalara neden oldu: "Şimdi ben sabaha kadar burada durup geçmiş hakkında sızlanıp şikayet mi edeyim? Ben sabaha kadar burada durup geçmiş hakkında sızlansam Kasım (Süleymani) dirilecek mi? Seyyid Hasan (Nasrullah) dirilecek mi? Elimize ne geçecek? Gelin bir gerçeği kabul edelim; Mao'nun Çin için yaptığını biz de yapalım. Sayın doktor dedi ki: Çinliler her zaman dünyanın büyük ekonomilerinden biriydi ancak yüz yıl boyunca aşağılandılar. Mao geldi ne yaptı? Mao geldi ve bu yüz yıllık aşağılanmaya son verdi. Nasıl son verdi? 'Kendime inanıyorum ki ABD'nin karşısına oturup onunla müzakere edebilirim' dedi. Çin, 1976 yılından ve Mao'nun ölümünden sonra ilerlemedi; 1970-1971 yıllarından sonra, yani Mao kendisinde 'dünyayla iletişim kurabilirim' inancını bulduktan sonra ilerledi. Bugün Çin'de Mao'nun heykeline tapıyorlar/saygı gösteriyorlar. Ancak onu Kültür Devrimi ile Çin halkını sefil eden biri olarak değil; kimse Mao'yu bunun sorumlusu olarak anmıyor. Mao'yu ne olarak anıyorlar? Çin'in yüz yıllık aşağılanmasına son veren ve Çin'in bu fırsatı kullanarak öne doğru atılım yapmasına izin veren kişi olarak anıyorlar. Her şeyi bir tehdit olarak görüyoruz. Başörtüsünü (hicabı) bir siper, bir mevzi gibi görüyoruz. Peki nasıl oluyor da sosyal bir mesele askeri bir konuya dönüşüyor? Çünkü biz her şeyi tehdit olarak görüyoruz. Bu yüzden benim söylemek istediğim şudur: Bu sorundan kurtulabilmemiz için bakış açımızı değiştirmemiz gerekiyor. Tehdit odaklı bakış açımızı fırsat odaklı bir bakış açısına dönüştürmeliyiz. Eğer bölgeye bakışımız tehdit odaklı olursa, büyükelçimizin Kudüs Gücü temsilcisi olması gerekir. Ama bakışımız fırsat odaklı olursa, büyükelçimizin bir tüccar veya diplomat olması gerekir. Neden bizim bölgedeki; Afganistan’daki, Suriye’deki, Irak’taki temsilcilerimiz ve büyükelçilerimiz Kudüs Gücü temsilcisi? Çünkü biz oraları tehdit olarak görüyoruz. Eğer tehdit olarak görmezsek, işte o zaman fırsatlar için bir zemin oluşur. Başka bir hususu daha belirteyim: Bu bakış açıları birbirini besler ve güçlendirir. Yani biz Suudi Arabistan’ı bir tehdit olarak görürsek, Suudi Arabistan için de tehdit haline geliriz. Suudi Arabistan bizi tehdit olarak gördüğünde, biz de Suudi Arabistan için bir tehdit oluruz. Düşmanlığa dayalı bu bakış açısına alıştığımız için sürekli geçmişi yeniden inşa edip duruyoruz. İmam Hüseyin döneminden bugüne kadar olan geçmişi... Bakın, ne zaman birisi gelip şiir okusa —o Sayın Mutii mi nedir, kimse artık— Suudi Arabistan hakkında şiir okurken iki yıl sonrasını hiç düşünmüyor. Ben onlara diyordum ki: Bu JCPOA'yı (Nükleer Anlaşma'yı) —kusura bakmayın, ağır bir benzetme olacak ama— bazı olumsuz durumların üzerini örtmek için tuvalet kağıdı gibi kullanıyorsunuz; ama yarın bir gün gelip aynı şeyle burnunuzu temizlemek zorunda kalacağınızı hesaba katmıyorsunuz. Cuma namazında Suudi Arabistan aleyhine o şiirleri okuyan kişi bilmeliydi ki; yarın öbür gün Yüce Lider (Hamanei), Suudi Arabistan Savunma Bakanı'nın yanında oturmak durumunda kalacaktır..."
- Oct 7, 20267.3x their median
Green member behind Zionism motion named as 'close friend' of jailed al-Qaeda supporter in court https://t.co/JisEnDEY8k
- Oct 7, 20265.8x their median
Vlevo boty židovských obětí nacistického teroru v Osvětimi. Vpravo boty židovských obětí islamistického teroru na poli před Gazou. Dnes je den památky 1 195 zavražděných Hamásem, 251 odvlečených rukojmí. Datum 7. října patří jim. Ostatních 364 dní klidně truchleme za palestinské oběti, ale židovským a arabským obětem palestinského teroru ponechejme aspoň tento jeden den.
- Oct 7, 20265.3x their median
Toho dne byl Dan poněkud neklidný. Ošetřující lékař opomněl předepsat obvyklou dávku tišících léků. https://t.co/CQ7cjoLmxA
- Oct 5, 20263.5x their median
Vše nej k 90nám Ferdinanda Vaňka přejí věrní @Havloids. https://t.co/BNijwVC6BH
- Oct 6, 20262.8x their median
Světová zdravotnická organizace uklidňuje, že riziko moru objeveného v Rusku je nízké. Šéf WHO ještě v lednu 2020 uklidňoval, že kolem rizika covidu z Číny je “nutné zachovat klid.” OK, jsem zcela v klidu. Stay Fonzy! https://t.co/y13LfpA2H8
- Oct 7, 20262.5x their median
#zdenikumyvalaMortyho Sdílet ubytování s olbřímí kosmickou kočkou přináší množství netušených výhod. Neustále naťapáno tlapami nasáklými vodou ze sprchy a picí fontány, překračování 12kilového žoku uprostřed chodeb a pokojů nebo hrějivý a zpravidla dusivá kočičí přízeň. Fajn den! https://t.co/i1paruUgee
- Oct 9, 20261.6x their median
Can the whole world be wrong? As the Nobel Peace Prize lends new legitimacy to accusations of genocide against Israel, Natan Sharansky revisits an old lesson: Consensus is not truth. https://t.co/Y4NLsiQPiB
- Oct 4, 2026
BREAKING: Hamas militias tortured a Palestinian man to death in Gaza. Sources in Gaza say Mahmoud Samaneh, who was previously affiliated with militias operating behind the Yellow Line, surrendered to Hamas 15 days ago after receiving assurances that he would be safe. After 15 days of torture in a Hamas prison, he died. His family was denied permission to take his body for a forensic examination.
- Oct 9, 2026
Amerika se připojí k Afghánistánu a Íránu mezi země s veřejnými popravami. Usmrcení Nidala Hasana, který z extremisticko-náboženských pohnutek v roce 2009 ve Fort Hood zákeřně povraždil 13 neozbrojených vojáků, popravčí četou se bude živě vysílat. https://t.co/XucUZj4fEB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 259 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.24%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #freegao, #gaozhisheng, #whereisgaozhisheng.
- What is Jakub Szántó's engagement rate on X?
- Jakub Szántó (@JakubSzanto) has an engagement rate of 0.24%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 107,902 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.24%, Jakub Szántó sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JakubSzanto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JakubSzanto post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.