Back to @Jaime_Bassa's profile

Jaime Bassa engagement report

@Jaime_Bassa - 294K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.109%
of 294K followers
Per impression
3.46%
9.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
319
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 3.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tag: #cerimedo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jaime Bassa's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.109%, Jaime Bassa sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 215 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 202619x their median

    Hoy no solo perdió el gobierno y el PDG, sino también, una forma de hacer política. Una forma basada en la mentira, en la manipulación y en la irresponsabilidad, para satisfacer objetivos que poco le importan a la ciudadanía. ¿Cuál será la próxima mentira del gobierno? Te leo https://t.co/girfk2sBhK

    3.9K1.6K6426463K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202616x their median

    El Pdte anunció nueva agenda de seguridad, con un paquete de 30 proyectos de ley. Pero ni una sola palabra sobre secreto bancario, corrupción, fortalecer la fiscalización aduanera o de análisis financiero, control de armas. Harto control micro y de orden público. Del otro, nada.

    3.4K1.2K3595072K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202615x their median

    Aprobamos comisión investigadora para esclarecer la incidencia de las granjas de votos que maneja la extrema derecha. Ayer presentamos un proyecto para sancionar con cárcel la manipulación del electorado y la opinión pública. Seguiremos avanzando, hasta las últimas consecuencias. https://t.co/gJY9laUQ2E

    3.1K9764976529K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202614x their median

    El Partido de la Gente se ha transformado en el más fiel Partido de Gobierno. No se puede estar al mismo tiempo en la oposición y en el oficialismo. Valoramos las posiciones críticas al interior de esa bancada, pero el PDG tomó su decisión, es legítima, pero deben hacerse cargo https://t.co/YfHcepipTj

    3.0K1.3K2492957K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202613x their median

    Por fin los medios mostrando cómo ha sido la disposición del Gobierno al “diálogo”. La dupla Kast-Quiroz nos hará un daño difícil de reparar. https://t.co/8DiulZmKpL

    2.6K1.3K3106034K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202610x their median

    ¿Quieren repartirse “el sueldo de Chile” entre los amigos, como lo hicieron en dictadura? ¿Por qué creen que les vamos a aguantar cualquier bravata? https://t.co/0046ySkeM0

    1.9K7905427435K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20268.6x their median

    Un gran honor y responsabilidad ser elegido con la 1ª mayoría nacional para el Comité Central del FA. ¡Muchas gracias! Mi reconocimiento a Constanza Martínez por haber liderado una etapa tan importante y mis felicitaciones a Gael Yeomans por su excelente triunfo. Cuente conmigo.

    2.1K2493213639K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.7x their median

    Esto es importante. Presentamos un proyecto de ley contra la mentira, contra la información falsa y contra la manipulación electoral. Ojalá la clase política se comprometa con la defensa de manipulación verdad como fin último. #cerimedo https://t.co/qMXZzQFl4E

    1.2K5825838564K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20266.8x their median

    Autoridades públicas han incumplido su deber de reserva y custodia de un informe parcial y reservado, generando una alarma social que no tiene sustento empírico alguno. La Comisión Investigadora de la Cámara debe ayudarnos a llevar luz a una polémica muy oscura https://t.co/DQgNrH7dFl

    1.4K636911521K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.4x their median

    Cómo improvisa este Gobierno, qué lástima. https://t.co/AbnB1B4FGj

    6511862342319K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cerimedo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 3.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Jaime Bassa's engagement rate on X?
Jaime Bassa (@Jaime_Bassa) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 293,930 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.109%, Jaime Bassa sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Jaime_Bassa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Jaime_Bassa post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going