Back to @JacobsBen's profile

Ben Jacobs engagement report

@JacobsBen - 920K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.184%
of 920K followers
Per impression
1.42%
120K views on a typical post
Reach
13.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 920K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 120K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #bhafc, #cfc.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #bhafc, #cfc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ben Jacobs's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.184%, Ben Jacobs sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 364 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 5, 202646x their median

    🚨 Exclusive: The White House made a direct call to FIFA to ask Gianni Infantino to review Folarin Balogun’s red card. FIFA approached for comment and referred to the findings of its independent committee. FIFA sources insist White House influence could not affect the decision due to the powers contained in Article 27 and the independent nature of the disciplinary panel.

    54K9.0K4.2K11K37M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202627x their median

    "Rubbish name, that" Cole Palmer is not having the new Chelsea front three nickname 'JP Morgan' 😅 https://t.co/ytMXMwqgJQ

    43K2.2K3324157.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202613x their median

    Chelsea are the first team in Premier League history to score inside five minutes in their opening three games.💨 https://t.co/ABphkwU2X1

    20K1.4K7445238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202610x their median

    Understand Stamford Bridge is well-placed to host Shakhtar’s #UCL games this season. Shakhtar’s preference is to stage games at Chelsea’s home, as @NizaarKinsella called. Talks are now ongoing between the clubs. Shakhtar are expected to communicate their decision next week.🏟️ https://t.co/n6FAPHzzmm

    14K1.0K5259705.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20269.1x their median

    🚨 JJ Gabriel is in Barcelona for talks. Barcelona and Real Madrid viewed as the most viable contenders if Gabriel goes abroad. https://t.co/3V0AGGugCX

    14K7152692141.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.0x their median

    Tino Livramento, Kobbie Mainoo, Cole Palmer, Marcus Rashford and Declan Rice have all withdrawn from England’s UEFA Nations League fixtures. James Garner and Morgan Gibbs-White have been called up.🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/7Zc6YZ6YGO

    14K675110159422K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.8x their median

    Monaco's Lamine Camara has been offered to Chelsea and Liverpool as a late window opportunity. Crystal Palace had a bid turned down earlier this month.🇸🇳 https://t.co/24Cm4YVyrz

    14K7712063401.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.5x their median

    Manchester United delighted with the Carlos Baleba deal. Feeling a year ago was Brighton wanted 'Moises Caicedo' type money even though a price was never offered. 12 months ago, Manchester United were prepared to pay around £75m. They now add Baleba for five million less. Baleba will sign a 5+1 contract subject to formalities.🔴

    13K74513939612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.7x their median

    Ben Chilwell scores the winner on his debut as Crystal Palace win 3-2 at Fulham.🦅 https://t.co/z0ghd56Cx5

    13K4543513179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.4x their median

    Chelsea confirm Circle Internet Group as their Principal Partner and front-of-shirt partner beginning with the 2026/27 season.💲 https://t.co/qaE6PqxS1h

    11K83312897651K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mufc#bhafc#cfc#mcfc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 920K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 120K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #bhafc, #cfc.

What is Ben Jacobs's engagement rate on X?
Ben Jacobs (@JacobsBen) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 920,408 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.184%, Ben Jacobs sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JacobsBen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JacobsBen post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going