Back to @JackPosobiec's profile

Jack Posobiec engagement report

@JackPosobiec - 3.3M followers on X

Measured over 423 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 3.3M followers
Per impression
1.36%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
1.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
609
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
45.73/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 3.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 423 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 45.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 423 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 166K interactions, about 301x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #antiwhites, #celebratesheen, #diwali.

Measured over 423 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #antiwhites, #celebratesheen, #diwali.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jack Posobiec's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Jack Posobiec sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link27% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 26, 2013301x their median

    Good men must die, but death can't kill their names.

    131K31K1.6K2.0KView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026238x their median

    A SECOND PLANE HAS HIT THE SECOND TOWER - AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK https://t.co/MByozyfVRx

    130K12K1.5K2.1K16M viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 2013180x their median

    Should be public execution for all to see-you will end this bullshit fast!

    84K25K5.8K6.5KView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026171x their median

    🚨BREAKING: Leader of the Church of England, Sarah Mullally, is facing calls to RESIGN after she was pictured giving an award to a radical Islamist who forces his wife to cover even HER EYES This is disgusting support for barbarism. I see why Catholicism is surging. https://t.co/Hu1FUYW64J

    85K17K2.3K6381.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026150x their median

    This is the ex-husband of Susan Smith. In 1994, she drowned their two young boys In 2024, he spoke at her parole: "I am their father. She has never expressed any remorse. She made a choice. They say it was 30 years, but that's only 15 per child to me. It's not enough" https://t.co/l7wcyDghC9

    81K9.9K5811382.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026143x their median

    NEW: Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin reveals on 'CBS Mornings' that the lone, male holdout juror who voted to find Clancy guilty of murdering her children was the *only* person of color -- a black man. The 11 not-guilty jurors -- who hectored him for a week to cave -- were all white.

    66K7.9K7.0K5.7K30M viewsView on X
  • Dec 16, 2016156x their median

    What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50 million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?

    67K13K1.5K4.1KView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026129x their median

    Car fire at the Wawa in Northampton, PA, yesterday. I’m genuinely not trying to be funny at all, but is it normal for a firefighter to have this much difficulty controlling the hose? https://t.co/XMwbFE8h52

    72K3.2K1.8K1.2K15M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026124x their median

    Vice President JD Vance on H1-B visas: "If you’re going to bring in an accountant making $45,000 a year to replace an accountant who is an American making $60,000 a year, that’s not you using the program to bring in a genius. That’s you destroying American jobs and defrauding the American people... my view is the H1-B program is completely broken."

    62K9.5K3.1K6474.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026123x their median

    18 years ago, only one Duke student went on mainstream media to defend the Duke lacrosse players His name is Stephen Miller https://t.co/PxW0d8Z924

    65K9.5K7342901.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#antiwhites#celebratesheen#diwali#iowasenate

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 3.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 423 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 45.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 423 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 166K interactions, about 301x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #antiwhites, #celebratesheen, #diwali.

What is Jack Posobiec's engagement rate on X?
Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 423 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,278,429 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Jack Posobiec sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JackPosobiec have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JackPosobiec post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 45.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going