Back to @JackPosobiec's profile

Jack Posobiec engagement report

@JackPosobiec - 3.3M followers on X

Measured over 214 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 3.3M followers
Per impression
1.10%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
1.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
456
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
21.07/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 3.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 214 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 21.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 214 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 86x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #corkecrew, #breaking, #freedom250.

Measured over 214 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #corkecrew, #breaking, #freedom250.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jack Posobiec's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Jack Posobiec sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202686x their median

    Retards are hanging out their windows to try to prove Lindsay Clancy is innocent despite the fact she has already admitted to murdering her children. Are women bored and lonely or just retarded? https://t.co/45edakwVK0

    35K2.3K1.6K4232.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202657x their median

    Men seeing the psychos they left their kids with. https://t.co/1u1xOhY0NJ

    23K2.7K476267537K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202657x their median

    I have been busy with dozens of other time-sensitive matters, but I wanted to comment on this. Our federal (and most state) employment laws mandate a level playing field for American workers vis-à-vis foreigners — yet many American tech (and other) companies prefer to hire cheaper/exploitable foreign workers to do routine jobs Americans could do, and they do this by failing to post jobs on their normal hiring channels (PERM violations), letting foreign-born hiring managers pipeline cheap foreign labor from body-shop mills over American workers (H1-B abuses), lie about their eligibility for no-cap H1-B hiring, abuse other visa categories such as J-1 visas (we see you, universities!), abuse OPT hiring to get cheap, exploitable foreign labor, and sometimes — getting super arrogant, gaslight laid-off and sidelined Americans while doing any of the above. These are not good business practices; they are not patriotic economic practices; and they are illegal labor practices. This administration will not allow American employers to discriminate against American workers. It is illegal, wrong, and bad for our economy. I am sure my colleagues at @USEEOC and @USDOL agree. We are all on the case, and working together to level the playing field for US workers. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

    21K3.8K1.1K329952K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202655x their median

    Jesus, it’s time. https://t.co/nLXDwrWjKz

    24K1.1K41469343K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202653x their median

    Woman’s church membership gets terminated for leaving her husband and children to shack-up with another man. Churches should be doing more of this. https://t.co/96MoRdDAop

    22K938474153941K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202652x their median

    No lies detected https://t.co/Q4pz39HwF7

    22K1.5K258117970K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202650x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump administration pauses all immigrant visa applications worldwide.

    20K1.6K4294212.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202637x their median

    H-1B visa = scam H-2A visa = scam H-2B visa = scam J-1 visa = scam EB-5 visa = scam

    14K2.5K37566853K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202636x their median

    This is the best witness yet. "She heard a voice that she never heard before, and she never experienced it since, but she only experienced it for the 18 minutes that it took to kill her children. And to put it mildly that is very unusual. Very very unusual. I'm always very careful when someone experiences the symptom only during the course of committing the offense." Dr. Kirk Heilbrun - a forensic doctor with 46 years experience

    15K1.7K16277460K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202633x their median

    A new trend? Let’s throw ice at your bathtub so you don’t hurt your kid https://t.co/5jQSp7D58l

    9.8K4692.8K2.0K12M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#corkecrew#breaking#freedom250#therealfoodshow

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 3.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 214 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 21.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 214 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 86x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #corkecrew, #breaking, #freedom250.

What is Jack Posobiec's engagement rate on X?
Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 214 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,285,142 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Jack Posobiec sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JackPosobiec have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JackPosobiec post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 21.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going