Back to @JShannonhl's profile

John Shannon engagement report

@JShannonhl - 145K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 145K followers
Per impression
0.115%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
5.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 169x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vgk, #comefromaway, #seakraken.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #vgk, #comefromaway, #seakraken.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Shannon's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, John Shannon sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,665 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,911 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link84% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 84% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026169x their median

    Here’s to the people of Gander, who on one of the toughest days of our lives, showed the world what friendship and neighbours do when asked. 🇨🇦🇺🇸 #comefromaway

    1.4K9315125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026106x their median

    Screaming 🗣️ “THAT’S KRAKEN HOCKEY, BABY” for years to come! The #SeaKraken and @JohnForslund have come to a multi-year agreement to keep the best game announcer in the business onboard as the voice of Seattle hockey ⬇️ https://t.co/jFGuHLFT1j

    81677392551K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202630x their median

    Barry Melrose was a beacon of hockey in the United States for so many years. His passion and belief in the game were second to none. His time at ESPN reflected how much he loved hockey. For many, he kept the game alive. Thank you Barry. Rest well.

    249161158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202623x their median

    🚨 BLACK IS BACK—ON AIR! 🚨 Join me today, tomorrow and all next week for Middays with Rod Black, live from 9 a.m. to noon on AM 640! Toronto talk. Sports. News. Big opinions. Bigger laughs. And absolutely no idea what might happen next. 🎙️ AM 640 — Turn me on. Turn it up. Join the conversation! Let’s Go.♥️🇨🇦🎙️

    1801117225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202620x their median

    100% Canucks Pleased to announce that our new co-host for the podcast is Kevin Woodley. Thrilled to have Kevin on board this season. Show #1 later today. https://t.co/KQxnvuWmxE

    16777218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202613x their median

    Attention all Hockey Nerds…The statistical history of the Winnipeg Jets now will include both iterations of the franchise. As a result, the Jets’ history now encompasses their first stint in Winnipeg (1979-96) as well as their years as the Atlanta Thrashers (1999-2011) and their seasons in Winnipeg since 2011-12.   The statistical history of the inactive Coyotes franchise only will encompass its years in Arizona (1996-2024) and therefore will not be included in the Jets’ history.

    99614143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.2x their median

    NHL Morning Skate is LIVE from 7AM-11AM ET with @LaughlinSXM and @GordStellick! 🎧- https://t.co/9RADHtZJJz https://t.co/FqlEBkhnyq

    1871314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.8x their median

    100% Hockey Surveying the landscape of the NHL with Ray Ferraro. Full podcast at https://t.co/4nHOrjhuf9 Soon to be up on @YouTube https://t.co/m9blApXwEz

    223007.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.4x their median

    Today with @Bob_Stauffer from 4-6 p.m. MT on @CHED880 📻 4:35 Texts 5:05 TSN & @GotYerBackPod's @TSNRyanRishaug 5:35 100% Hockey's @JShannonhl Text us at 780-451-8800📲 👂👇 https://t.co/7mgzlVDWkt https://t.co/KY9V5cWNaF

    1650116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.4x their median

    100% Hockey Ray Ferraro on the GMs in Anaheim, Columbus and Winnipeg. Who has it best? Full podcast at https://t.co/4nHOrjgWpB Soon to be up on @YouTube https://t.co/MT9nUXcB81

    183108.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vgk#comefromaway#seakraken

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 169x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vgk, #comefromaway, #seakraken.

What is John Shannon's engagement rate on X?
John Shannon (@JShannonhl) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,919 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, John Shannon sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JShannonhl have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JShannonhl post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going