Back to @JDRucker's profile

JD Rucker engagement report

@JDRucker - 116K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 116K followers
Per impression
1.15%
477 views on a typical post
Reach
0.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 477 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 7123x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

JD Rucker's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, JD Rucker sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 20267123x their median

    It sucks knowing that an illegal alien can cancel out your vote because our Senate @LeaderJohnThune didn't have the spine to secure our elections.

    35K7.0K730161167K viewsView on X
  • Nov 20, 20203751x their median

    Sidney Powell wouldn't come on Tucker's show to reveal evidence BEFORE presenting it in discovery and open court. His response was a four-minute segment insinuating there's no evidence. @FoxNews getting Tucker to echo leftist talking points is a perfect end for the network.

    17K3.3K993888View on X
  • Oct 6, 20261994x their median

    Imagine what you could do with an extra $11,000 a year. That's how much you'll save with me as governor. We pay more for gas, housing and taxes than anywhere in America. Ballots are out now. JUST TRY IT. https://t.co/EHfFbS8wWz

    9.2K2.5K2417161K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026204x their median

    NATALIE WINTERS: A Left Wing Foundation Spent Nearly Half A Million Dollars Studying PROPERTY REDISTRIBUTION For IMMIGRANT INCLUSION In RURAL AMERICA @nataliegwinters https://t.co/xU4FtaaItK

    734437272614K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20264.3x their median

    Xavier Becerra Is Terrified He Could Actually Lose After Disastrous Debate and Bald-Faced Lies I endorse @SteveHiltonx https://t.co/pToYPUPmWB

    176121.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Kathy Hochul Drops the Dumbest Piece of Gaslighting in the History of Democrat Math https://t.co/upnVqZmHLU

    4300511 viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Based French Girl Is Ashamed of What France Has Become as She Warns America https://t.co/nYYmoOIWB1

    4200443 viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    NY Times, 2009. Abdul El-Sayed declared he would live in a "Sharia-compliant way." Those who comply with Sharia must put it above all else, including the Constitution and the nation. https://t.co/PTJ04naErm

    2300420 viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    Palate-cleansing deep thought: Removing the bowl changes everything https://t.co/yEcUbi0RrZ

    5000413 viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    The GOP is feckless, especially in the Senate. But I'll take weak and ineffective over the pure chaos and destruction the Democrat Party has become. This election is about building a hedge to slow the Red-Green Alliance while we build a wall to stop them for good.

    4000221 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 477 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 7123x its own typical post.

What is JD Rucker's engagement rate on X?
JD Rucker (@JDRucker) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 116,379 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, JD Rucker sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JDRucker have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JDRucker post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going