JD Rucker engagement report
@JDRucker - 116K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 477 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 7123x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
JD Rucker's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, JD Rucker sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 6, 20267123x their median
It sucks knowing that an illegal alien can cancel out your vote because our Senate @LeaderJohnThune didn't have the spine to secure our elections.
- Nov 20, 20203751x their median
Sidney Powell wouldn't come on Tucker's show to reveal evidence BEFORE presenting it in discovery and open court. His response was a four-minute segment insinuating there's no evidence. @FoxNews getting Tucker to echo leftist talking points is a perfect end for the network.
- Oct 6, 20261994x their median
Imagine what you could do with an extra $11,000 a year. That's how much you'll save with me as governor. We pay more for gas, housing and taxes than anywhere in America. Ballots are out now. JUST TRY IT. https://t.co/EHfFbS8wWz
- Oct 5, 2026204x their median
NATALIE WINTERS: A Left Wing Foundation Spent Nearly Half A Million Dollars Studying PROPERTY REDISTRIBUTION For IMMIGRANT INCLUSION In RURAL AMERICA @nataliegwinters https://t.co/xU4FtaaItK
- Oct 6, 20264.3x their median
Xavier Becerra Is Terrified He Could Actually Lose After Disastrous Debate and Bald-Faced Lies I endorse @SteveHiltonx https://t.co/pToYPUPmWB
- Oct 7, 2026
Kathy Hochul Drops the Dumbest Piece of Gaslighting in the History of Democrat Math https://t.co/upnVqZmHLU
- Oct 7, 2026
Based French Girl Is Ashamed of What France Has Become as She Warns America https://t.co/nYYmoOIWB1
- Oct 6, 2026
NY Times, 2009. Abdul El-Sayed declared he would live in a "Sharia-compliant way." Those who comply with Sharia must put it above all else, including the Constitution and the nation. https://t.co/PTJ04naErm
- Oct 6, 2026
Palate-cleansing deep thought: Removing the bowl changes everything https://t.co/yEcUbi0RrZ
- Oct 7, 2026
The GOP is feckless, especially in the Senate. But I'll take weak and ineffective over the pure chaos and destruction the Democrat Party has become. This election is about building a hedge to slow the Red-Green Alliance while we build a wall to stop them for good.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 477 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 7123x its own typical post.
- What is JD Rucker's engagement rate on X?
- JD Rucker (@JDRucker) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 116,379 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, JD Rucker sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JDRucker have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JDRucker post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.