Back to @JDGoldboys's profile

JD  engagement report

@JDGoldboys - 263K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 263K followers
Per impression
0.196%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
11.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.5/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.196% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 92x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #polymarketpartner, #dkpartner.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #polymarketpartner, #dkpartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

JD 's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, JD  sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link34% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 202692x their median

    BREAKING NEWS: Caleb Williams transported to the hospital after watching that hit on Jaxson Dart

    5.3K1942113233K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202631x their median

    Don’t forget to play this on FD https://t.co/ph9reB9rOk

    1.7K445011395K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202617x their median

    Early look Champions League https://t.co/DKBKYYlv74

    92448323253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202611x their median

    The man @FIFABrit strikes again! Not bad for a random Tuesday. https://t.co/LhxgmWDXdN I’ll get some folks some dinners tonight on behalf of @FIFABrit Drop the CA or Venmo and repost ♻️ to enter. https://t.co/1LWZR3dvtY

    262196211580K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202611x their median

    Will this happen 3 weeks in a row? https://t.co/mnA1rLiyqD

    6261810064K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.2x their median

    If this wins I’ll give it away here. Simply repost ♻️and drop CA 💰to enter. FanDuel: +6132 Kalshi: +10000 🤯 💣 Pete Crow-Armstrong HR 💣 Rafael Devers HR 💣 Munetaka Murakami HR Trade $25, get $25 with code JD20. Available nationwide except Nevada. https://t.co/YjyjuSH8DK https://t.co/GnQgU2cNQM

    297128124141K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20269.1x their median

    Kyle Pitts when we needed him https://t.co/eEdyF4qM91

    4528011227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20269.0x their median

    Thank you @FIFABrit Was 1 Fernandes shot away from 677k 🤮 Repost and Drop the cashapp or Venmo let’s do another giveaway. https://t.co/LhxgmWDXdN https://t.co/SWXEgq0oK0

    2891191312110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20266.5x their median

    Bet Reset ♻️ Best of luck tonight 🍀 https://t.co/U7qPQV4aEJ

    3102157163K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.9x their median

    Get this on 365 https://t.co/vEtIQogVfv

    281510074K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#polymarketpartner#dkpartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.196% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 92x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #polymarketpartner, #dkpartner.

What is JD 's engagement rate on X?
JD  (@JDGoldboys) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, JD  sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JDGoldboys have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JDGoldboys post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going