J.C. Parets engagement report
@JC_ParetsX - 215K followers on X
Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.732% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #collegefootball, #fairleadstrategies, #floridastate.
Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #collegefootball, #fairleadstrategies, #floridastate.
Compared with accounts its own size
J.C. Parets's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.045%, J.C. Parets sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 202629x their median
The States in red have no NFL, NBA, MLB, or NHL team. https://t.co/j42AP6d826
- Sep 23, 202628x their median
The green threads for @canes_hockey #uniswag https://t.co/eogiD1tNUv
- Sep 7, 202618x their median
Doak Campbell is electric #fsufootball #floridastate #collegefootball https://t.co/8MvzMGyXdN
- Sep 28, 202610x their median
JUST ME, RIGHT? 1) Are you also kinda thinking, "sure feels like something really fucking bad is gonna happen soon, doesn't it?" 2) Does *that* not have you kinda thinking, "every time I think that, I'm wrong. I bet the market is up 10% in a fucking month." 3) Does THAT not kinda have you thinking, "well, last time I did the inverse trade, I *still* fucking lost." 4) And does THAT not kinda have you thinking, "yeah, fuck it, I guess I'll just sit this one out entirely; which guarantees it'll happen?"
- Sep 25, 20268.1x their median
Tough to have a market top with everyone rushing to cash. https://t.co/ftvoNO2Ura
- Sep 25, 20266.6x their median
Stocks are beating Bonds like nothing we've seen in over 50 years 👀 This is starting to get extreme. It's stretched well beyond average, and the thing is, extremes don't last... https://t.co/Qih8bLYiKr
- Sep 28, 20266.5x their median
The longest duration Treasury bond ETF is now down 67% from its peak in March 2020. How is that possible? The 30-Year Treasury yield has moved from an all-time low of 0.8% in March 2020 up to 5.6% today. Long duration + Rising interest rates from all-time low levels = Pain https://t.co/2dMVvAljWo
- Sep 24, 20266.1x their median
Since 1300, long term government bond yields have averaged 5.8%. The current 5.2% 10-year Treasury yield is 60bps below the 726 year average. https://t.co/dhMornad0H
- Sep 9, 20264.4x their median
JUST IN: Apple $AAPL unveils new iPhone 18 Pro & Pro Max. https://t.co/Sw98zUv51U
- Sep 26, 20263.9x their median
During healthy bull markets, you regularly see High Beta stocks outperform Low Volatility. Yesterday, the High Beta Index closed at the highest level in American history relative to Low Volatility. https://t.co/5iIS2OU9QV
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.732% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #collegefootball, #fairleadstrategies, #floridastate.
- What is J.C. Parets's engagement rate on X?
- J.C. Parets (@JC_ParetsX) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 73 original posts from the last 30 days against 215,357 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.045%, J.C. Parets sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JC_ParetsX have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JC_ParetsX post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.23 posts per day across the measured window.