Back to @JCLayfield's profile

John Layfield engagement report

@JCLayfield - 621K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 621K followers
Per impression
0.657%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
3.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
155
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 67x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #circagrandissimo, #circasports, #circasportsmillion.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #circagrandissimo, #circasports, #circasportsmillion.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Layfield's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, John Layfield sits above the 25th percentile of the 158,172 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,172 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,971 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 202667x their median

    This was so realistic 🤣😂🍿 https://t.co/akZZ5s7ZrS

    16K1.4K8672001.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202660x their median

    🚨🇧🇷 TODAY IS THE DAY! 🚨 A Brazilian psychic with 23M+ followers claims a UFO mothership will appear above Hard Rock Stadium during Brazil vs Scotland at the 2026 World Cup on June 24. 👽🛸 She says players, officials, and hundreds of fans could be abducted by alien beings before being returned, all on live TV. 🤯 The prediction went viral after she claimed to have the same dream twice. 💭

    12K8642.0K1.4K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202664x their median

    Dallas Cowboys defense https://t.co/ihACjDJQQ8

    8.5K920334183930K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202639x their median

    I think it’s wonderful my friend Dawn Marie is joining onlyfans. I hope she makes millions. I just got approached by OnlyFats, so you may hear an announcement soon.

    5.8K1637631476K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202637x their median

    Never forget when Bradshaw forgot his key to the APA office, so he went around the door and got a spare key 😂 https://t.co/cPMOKXKVyZ

    5.2K5033126322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202634x their median

    This will never not make me laugh 😂 https://t.co/ZBdyeeXfso

    4.8K39726391.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202633x their median

    The hottest Indy star in the world! Big Man Tater! https://t.co/KD4bB2eWJq

    4.8K2317743404K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202627x their median

    Sign guy was a good guy, very clever and helped the wrestling business, I really enjoyed him being at events and later got to know him- my signs were not funny….. (I always said that to him). RIP my friend. https://t.co/kx8SIgzP2k

    3.9K24722144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202626x their median

    Everybody wants to know what happened with that last second in the Michigan game. Well, let me break it down for the Big Ten. You see, you got 60 seconds in a minute. And then you got 15 minutes in a quarter. You got one clock showing 0:00… Another clock still holding onto ONE SECOND… You take all of that, then you add the replay booth to the mix. And the Big Ten’s chances of explaining it so anybody understands drastically goes down! Everybody’s been making fun of Steiner Math for years. But when I tell you 141⅔%, at least you know what the number is. The Big Ten got clocks doing math that even I can’t explain. So next time there’s one second left in a Michigan game, forget trying to figure out which clock you’re supposed to be watching. CALL THE BIG BAD BOOTY DADDY. I’ll straighten the numbers out. Because the numbers don’t lie… AND STEINER MATH DON’T NEED A REPLAY REVIEW.

    3.3K495131101275K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202624x their median

    22 years ago Eddie Guerrero hit one of the most iconic frog-splashes of all time against JBL flying from the top of the cage. THIS BEING ON A RANDOM SMACKDOWN IS INSANE MAN 😭 (2024) https://t.co/Cxft22aitN

    3.1K4277341189K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#circagrandissimo#circasports#circasportsmillion#circasurvivor#coolman

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 67x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #circagrandissimo, #circasports, #circasportsmillion.

What is John Layfield's engagement rate on X?
John Layfield (@JCLayfield) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 621,283 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, John Layfield sits above the 25th percentile of the 158,172 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JCLayfield have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JCLayfield post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going