Back to @Ivarpi's profile

Ivar Arpi engagement report

@Ivarpi - 161K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.076%
of 161K followers
Per impression
1.29%
9.5K views on a typical post
Reach
5.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ivar Arpi's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.076%, Ivar Arpi sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link92% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 92% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202612x their median

    Läs @moreno_federico om hur Socialdemokraterna i Rosengård har förkryssade valsedlar, organiserad röstmobilisering och metoder som väcker frågor om partiets syn på valpåverkan. https://t.co/iKUcPgJ0s7

    1.2K254201523K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.8x their median

    När en politiker börjar med ”som liberal” vet man att ett problem snart ska förklaras olösligt. Elisabeth Thand Ringqvists (C) försvar av rätten att bära burka blottar en större fråga: hur blev det liberalt att skydda denna reaktionära kvinnosyn? https://t.co/yyKjFiaTHh

    93412123119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.8x their median

    Vänsterpartister avslöjas med judehat och Hamashyllningar. Ändå rusar partiet i förorten. I dagens Under all kritik pratar vi om vänsterns nya väljare. Men den verkligt obehagliga frågan är kanske inte vad partiets företrädare har sagt. https://t.co/sTJ9G3kLFp

    79010460221K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.4x their median

    Gav invandringen vänstern valsegern? Det räcker inte att bara räkna de nya medborgarna. Jag har granskat tusentals valdistrikt. I 470 invandrartäta distrikt framträder en förändring som väger tyngre än det ökade valdeltagandet. https://t.co/cLrg54LnuH

    6459631363K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.6x their median

    Örebropartiet vill avskaffa transferiatet: människor som enligt dem försörjs av skattemedel utan att skapa motsvarande värde. I dagens Rak höger pratar jag med @Markus_Allard om transferiatet, politiker, journalisterna och klägget runt den svenska makten. https://t.co/Fk9yhZZXwk

    5906326241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.9x their median

    DN har inte bara rapporterat, utan även bestämt vilken verklighetsbild som fått synas, och vad som trängts undan. I boken "Rikslikaren" granskar @JohanLundberg hur opinionsbildningen påverkat nyhetsrapportering, från de apatiska barnen och REVA till Gaza. https://t.co/GTPkel58G6

    31631709.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    Markus Allard gästade Rak höger för att prata om det han kallar transferiatet. Lyssna på hela här: https://t.co/Fk9yhZZXwk https://t.co/LLFyOI3iMX

    2892216125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.1x their median

    Idag har vi surrat SD-låten, kulturvänsterns hyckleri och cancelkultur med Rasmus Gozzi, Fröken Snusk och ingen mindre än Mårten @arndtzen, 100%s egna kulturjournalist straight outta SR. Har ni sett en bättre line-up? 😅 https://t.co/zH68k2QHRh

    233165215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.0x their median

    Jag har fått kontakt med föräldrar till barn/ungdomar som går i skolor med barn till kriminella klaner eller andra kriminella nätverk. Och hur det påverkar andra barn (och vuxna) i skolan, särskilt om hot/våld förekommer. Skriv gärna till mig om det: ivar.arpi(a)kvartal .se

    224222010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.6x their median

    Svenskar fostras att se sig själva som problemet. Men vad händer när de själva blir måltavlor? Under all kritik om Jens Ganmans ”Det svenska folkmordet”, förnedringsvåld och vreden över ett förändrat Sverige som knappt får plats i valrörelsen. https://t.co/IMnMgaOiMw

    17023429.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Ivar Arpi's engagement rate on X?
Ivar Arpi (@Ivarpi) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,495 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.076%, Ivar Arpi sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ivarpi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ivarpi post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going