Back to @ItsKieranDrew's profile

Kieran Drew engagement report

@ItsKieranDrew - 240K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 240K followers
Per impression
1.23%
7.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
86
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.83/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 19% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kieran Drew's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Kieran Drew sits above the 25th percentile of the 166,440 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.13%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.13%
p750.612%
p902.35%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 166,440 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,002 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.13%
75th percentile0.612%
90th percentile2.35%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video16% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 16% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 350 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 2026172x their median

    I am begging you to start writing by hand to preserve your ability to think. https://t.co/55qNDqKT5R

    13K1.6K376206299K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026104x their median

    Jung is unlike anyone I’ve ever read. https://t.co/odjcxU8bRU

    7.7K1.1K9692344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202652x their median

    i want to re-train my brain to deeply focus on one task for long periods of time. is the secret just reading?

    4.1K13321122335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202647x their median

    Never underestimate the power of people who introduce you to new ways of thinking and seeing life.

    3.5K490311862K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202637x their median

    Heard this the other day and man, it hit hard… When God wanted to make David king, he didn’t send him a crown. He sent him Goliath.

    2.9K276271283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202626x their median

    "Better bored than busy." @naval

    2.0K14135652K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 202419x their median

    Today's my 32nd birthday. Always incredibly grateful to be here—writing to you for the past 4 years has been so fun and fulfilling. I've gathered thousands of ideas to help me build my writing business. Here are 32 of the best: https://t.co/WAha6UZJ4j

    1.3K982138314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/InwSnyP9WD

    1.4K966921184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.7x their median

    I came across this post recently, and I love the way Michell put this “Your relationship with yourself cannot be built entirely around improvement.” Because the unspoken belief behind self-improvement is: “I’ll be worthy when...” https://t.co/KwTJUAvg18

    6143711421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.8x their median

    Madeira might be one of the only places in the world where you can live in a subtropical European city, hike above the clouds, and swim in the ocean, all within an hour of home. The temperature is 65–75 °F year round (perfect) And you can get a beautiful 3BR airbnb here for less than $500/night

    3611338442K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 19% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 172x its own typical post.

What is Kieran Drew's engagement rate on X?
Kieran Drew (@ItsKieranDrew) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 240,378 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Kieran Drew sits above the 25th percentile of the 166,440 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ItsKieranDrew have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ItsKieranDrew post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going