Back to @IterIntellectus's profile

vittorio engagement report

@IterIntellectus - 253K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.607%
of 253K followers
Per impression
2.07%
73K views on a typical post
Reach
29.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.198%
144 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.6/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 253K followers, an engagement rate of 0.607%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 73K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 172K interactions, about 114x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

vittorio's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.607%, vittorio sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 200 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 2026114x their median

    i am once again thinking about my friend's taiwanese mom who, shortly after gaining citizenship, got her first jury summons just a few minutes into voir dire they asked her what she thought the penalty for shoplifting should be and she said "death." they sent her home

    166K5.6K5223352.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202635x their median

    How Dostoevsky felt when he wrote a book about gambling to pay off his gambling debts and wrote it in only 26 days. https://t.co/6dOK5DWQzi

    50K2.3K6773501K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202616x their median

    > be wife > quits job > *10 minutes later* > starts crocheting > starts knitting > decides this is now a business > asks me to "invest" $10,000 > explains it will "probably operate at a loss for a while" women are such funny creatures

    23K304206521.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202613x their median

    This vial contains a new drug called PAC-3310. It was designed by ChatGPT, and I synthesized it in a chemistry lab I built in my garage. PAC-3310 is a new selective M4 muscarinic receptor agonist for treating schizophrenia - similar to the recent breakthrough drug Cobenfry, but improved. (1/7)

    15K1.2K8891.4K6.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202610.0x their median

    Ugly ppl are lucky roman emperors dont exist anymore. read somewhere once that one of them was coming back into rome and saw a guy so ugly he just pointed at him and had him killed right there and then carried on walking. i think about that every time i see an ugly person.

    14K70412185384K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20269.7x their median

    "OpenAI solved Navier-Stokes. Math is solved!" "No it's not. do you even know what Navier-Stokes is?" "No, Do you?" "No" https://t.co/jmDcXnmY1a

    14K7619551280K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.2x their median

    We’re sharing our alignment assessment of incidents in which Claude models gained unauthorized access to real systems during third-party cybersecurity evaluations mistakenly connected to the internet. METR will also conduct an independent investigation, with wide-ranging access, including to transcripts beyond the window in which the incidents occurred, and to Anthropic employees permitted to share confidential information. Our initial agreement runs for eight weeks, and we intend to give METR as much time as it deems necessary to complete a thorough investigation. https://t.co/2f3ypwLPUr

    7.0K1.0K7935913.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20265.6x their median

    i showed my dad how to use codex and claude code for his work. he just called me crying tears of joy because he’d done in 5 minutes what had taken one of his employees an entire month.

    8.1K18018337332K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 20263.4x their median

    https://t.co/Qt46TOy2hT

    4.4K3472541452.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.8x their median

    "what's the most esoteric piece of knowledge you know?" THE MUSIC OF THE SPHERES https://t.co/0gJXRAoTGp

    3.5K53410767146K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 253K followers, an engagement rate of 0.607%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 73K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 172K interactions, about 114x its own typical post.

What is vittorio's engagement rate on X?
vittorio (@IterIntellectus) has an engagement rate of 0.607%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 252,544 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.607%, vittorio sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IterIntellectus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IterIntellectus post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going