Back to @Iron868's profile

Iron engagement report

@Iron868 - 78K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.14%
of 78K followers
Per impression
0.249%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
56.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
117
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.249% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 60.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Iron's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.14%, Iron sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video49% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 49% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202624x their median

    GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym (https://t.co/XdVTjwDw35), placing it among the world's leading AI cybersecurity agents. Built on @grok Grok 4.5 and Grok 4.6, GCSA Agent demonstrates autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation, and verification capabilities for real-world code environments. When cutting-edge AI meets cybersecurity, we're seeing new possibilities emerge. Read Here: https://t.co/ahpdWoP0Vz @elonmusk @grok #Cybersecurity #AI #GCSA #CyberGym #Grok

    1.6K644462501.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202611x their median

    孙哥第一桶金居然来自特斯拉,2万美金变10万美金,赚到了人生的第一个50万,后面开启了自己的波场人生。 https://t.co/5nZiqY9Det

    1.0K911559257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20269.5x their median

    CZ时不时会说几句冷幽默,从“耐操”到你去坐牢几天看看?😂 https://t.co/HzgHxTnS5g

    866162284349K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.1x their median

    为什么穷人在币圈里赔得更多? 因为他们根本等不起。富人账户上有 1000 万,抓住一波行情赚 10% 就是 100 万。而 KOL 有无限子弹,打完了就接广告重开。 可穷人只有 10 万,哪怕赚 1 万,也填不满生活的窟窿,于是只能拼命交易,结果越做越亏。 真正毁掉他们的不是市场,而是生活的压力和焦虑。他们误以为交易就像打工,每天都要赚到钱才能活下去。 但高手的节奏从来不是日日赢,而是三年一战,一战吃饱。趋势来了,全力出击;退潮后,空仓修炼。 君子藏器于身,择时而动。急出来的穷,像绝症一样难治,只有富人心态才能逆转命运。

    643908617131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.1x their median

    孙哥的第一篇满分作文,恐怖的不是文采,而是他17所以就明白了这一生自己到底想要什么。 https://t.co/B4h9ZSh2Y6

    52370119489K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.8x their median

    坚持不下去的时候,就看看小侠:2015 年穷到靠士力架度日,后来向马爸爸借了 2000 块,买了辣条后翻身,一度做到 8000 万。这段时间又在中概股亏了 5000 万,也算给国家做了点贡献。 https://t.co/dZP2hJvlGh

    291111370147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.7x their median

    币圈玩合约的是最魔幻的群体,上一秒赚上千万,下一秒吃挂面。 https://t.co/ELo5MnyCNg

    35916583131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20263.5x their median

    Doppler is coming to @CantonNetwork. Starting with a vault for Canton Coin (canton-network:native) and paving the way for more institutional assets over time. We're bringing yield infrastructure for tokenized assets to the network built for institutional finance. More details to be shared soon.

    29555411586K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.1x their median

    模仿黄仁勋小伙在抖音卖起了显卡,这相似度黄总本人来了都愣一会。@jensenhuang https://t.co/SzHpX8uKJ8

    17841841190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.8x their median

    买比特币的人越来越少,因为大家心里都清楚,大饼每轮牛市的涨幅倍数越来越低。 自 2009 年诞生以来,比特币整体在震荡中上涨: 2011 年最高 $32,涨幅 300 万倍; 2013 年最高 $1,163,涨幅 36 倍; 2017 年最高 $19,892,涨幅 17 倍; 2021 年最高 $68,789,涨幅 3.4 倍; 2025 年最高 $126,080,涨幅 1.8 倍。

    1513167191K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.249% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 60.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Iron's engagement rate on X?
Iron (@Iron868) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,108 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.14%, Iron sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Iron868 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Iron868 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going