Iran Spectator engagement report
@IranSpec - 174K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 0.761% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 297x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Iran Spectator's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.029%, Iran Spectator sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 40% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 284 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 2026297x their median
Washington Post: Trump underwent an elaborate plan to hide his flight from Turkey to the United Kingdom last month using a catering food truck amid Iran threat. https://t.co/ySqAT6No94
- Aug 5, 2026279x their median
It turns out all the Iranian targets were fake. What shame for US army https://t.co/KZJWIhFX7L
- Jul 20, 2026272x their median
Pentagon identifies two US soldiers killed in Iranian strikes on Jordan airbase Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, killed July 17 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, killed July 18 https://t.co/zpmQzhzLTV
- Jul 18, 2026148x their median
The Chabahar Maritime Surveillance Tower — a civilian facility dedicated to maritime safety and navigation — was deliberately targeted by the United States on 16 June as part of its ongoing aggression that began on 28 February. The U.S. Secretary of War proudly released footage of the tower’s collapse. Had he been able, he would likely have broadcast the lethal missile attack on the #Minab school and the massacre of civilians in #Lamerd with the same chilling pride. Last night, the U.S also attacked power facilities and desalination pumps at the Bunji village pier in Jask, leaving more than 10,000 people without access to drinking water. For a State that once cast itself as the global champion of order, liberalism, and the war on terrorism, proudly displaying images of destroyed bridges and civilian infrastructure has become its only remaining “victory.” Yet with the collapse of every bridge, every tower, and every civilian facility, it is not merely steel and concrete that is being reduced to rubble. It is America’s moral standing — along with the entire architecture of international law and the civilizational claims of the West — that is crumbling before the world’s eyes. The question that must now be asked of America and its allies is stark and simple: What is the real difference between what they have done in Chabahar, Minab, Lamerd, and Jask, and the very acts of terrorism they once invoked to justify their wars and occupations?
- Jul 18, 2026147x their median
A message to JD Vance. https://t.co/2pQIFhZY3d
- Aug 22, 202664x their median
If Iran didn’t have missiles it would have been literally, physically and existentially raped. The U.S and Israel would have carpet bombed every single inch of the country with no retaliation. Missiles set a strong limit to what can and can’t be targeted in Iran.
- Jul 11, 202632x their median
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran's Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei to U.S and Israel: We will get revenge for killing my father "Revenge for my father is the demand of the nation and must certainly take place. We pledge to avenge the blood of the martyred leader and all of the martyrs of these two wars. Revenge does not stop at my existence or the existence of the rest of the officials, and revenge will inevitably be achieved." Source: Al Jazeera, @MKhamenei_ir / Writer: Mhedi
- Aug 8, 202643x their median
Pakistan is friends with Iran. Saudi is nothing militarily. Turkey-Iran have deep respect for one another and haven’t fought for 300 years. This is really an “pro-Iran” alliance made to counter Israel and its Abraham accords. Matter of fact, Iran could join this alliance in the future, if it wanted to.
- Aug 2, 202642x their median
اگه تو خارج بود، همه ازش تعریف میکردن؛ ولی چون تو ایرانه، کسی خبر نداره! عمل کاشت حلزون برای کودکان ناشنوا کاملا رایگانه؛ چون هیچ کودکی نباید فقط به خاطر پول، از نعمت شنیدن محروم بمونه. https://t.co/4HKlcykUsb
- Jul 13, 202640x their median
تو کی تموم میشی ایرانی دگوری🤦🏻♂️؟ https://t.co/5ppeYCDSm4
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 0.761% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 297x its own typical post.
- What is Iran Spectator's engagement rate on X?
- Iran Spectator (@IranSpec) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 173,989 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.029%, Iran Spectator sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @IranSpec have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @IranSpec post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.