Back to @InvestorsLive's profile

Nathan Michaud engagement report

@InvestorsLive - 247K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 247K followers
Per impression
0.132%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.17/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.132% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 813x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nathan Michaud's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Nathan Michaud sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,913 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 2026813x their median

    Today wasn't a game, it was cinema 🤩 https://t.co/F8eWc6u7vT

    8.0K8168295259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202618x their median

    The game is changing. I've been testing out Clear Street's new app/platform and it's incredible. Remember when Claude first came out? Some people dove in, mastered it, and it changed how they worked. Others poked at it once, shrugged, and moved on. If you're in that second group, this is your do-over. Except this isn't general purpose AI, it's built specifically for trading and it's already pre-built for you. No excuse this time. Omni is built for YOU. I would recommend trying it out (you'll be paid to do so) not just one or two days but really, get in there, push buttons, see what it can do and how it can benefit you. It's going to grow on you. Personally, I can't wait for them to offer IRAs. The day they do, I'm moving mine over. Managing a portfolio with a co-pilot like this is going to be a massive benefit. Get familiar with it now, and don't get left behind twice. Sizing a position used to mean doing math in your head while the tape moves. No thanks. Now you just say: "Take a 2% account position against yesterday's low of the day." It builds the order. You confirm. One click. Done. Stop already in place. Math class is cancelled. "Check my portfolio, what are the best covered calls to sell against my positions?" "Add 15% of my free cash into AAPL position and adjust risk to today's low" "Which options in my portfolio expire this week and what would be the ideal strikes to roll them for continuation of my original thesis?" What institutions only had before, now here for retail. Clear Street's order processing runs at 0.024 milliseconds. Industry average is 130ms. Zero downside to testing it out. Here's the deal: āœ… Keep a balance over $5k for 90 days and get a $250 bonus āœ… 1 month of @IUTraders free for anyone who funds an account āœ… 3.5% APY on uninvested cash āœ… IPO access āœ… Private deal allocation for accredited investors https://t.co/OrpLKU6cJI

    1661568129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20269.1x their median

    Final tribute to my dad and mentor Joe Valenti Today is the day I will say my final farewell to my dad. So I thought it would be an appropriate time to describe my dad the trader.

    7831728.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.6x their median

    $GPRO nice squeezer feels like few days of bait, letting shorts swing it safely and perhaps punishment today. Started in vs $1.50s over/under and TWAP scale all morning then sold chunk when it opened up @IUTraders https://t.co/5EwuwVDPre

    6742011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.7x their median

    $GRML trade plan posted in @IUTraders pre market goal was clear outs vs $20 over/under with a goal of a fade RED $2-3/share. All targets achieved. https://t.co/XDHDfjpULx

    5641213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.6x their median

    Tape told the story today here today Great trap set on $MSGY clear as day $4.10-4.20 What an open! @IUTraders https://t.co/n9zSORtY2m

    472207.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.0x their median

    She may multi task as much as me šŸ˜‚ https://t.co/jwbKAXJ4sN

    301208.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.0x their median

    oops deleted prior tweet on accident re: $DRUG comparison on $JAGX at $20 but here are the charts now - same result https://t.co/kq7H7mxl97

    282308.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.9x their median

    The lake was an ocean today 🌊 https://t.co/QZ6p9GUBko

    290308.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.4x their median

    šŸ’„ FREE SCAN + VIDEO šŸ’„ šŸ‘‰ The Game Has Changed: Video Scan for September 8, 2026 with @InvestorsLive & @Chris_J_Lance https://t.co/LQM9JFvjNf $MU $SNDK $MULL $DLL $SKHY $NVDA $MSTR $HOOD $PURR $CYPH $BE $GPRO $SPCX $TSLA $CBRS $ORCL $IWM $USO

    14100216K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.132% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 813x its own typical post.

What is Nathan Michaud's engagement rate on X?
Nathan Michaud (@InvestorsLive) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,038 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Nathan Michaud sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @InvestorsLive have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @InvestorsLive post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going