Insane Reality Leaks engagement report
@InsaneReality - 2.5M followers on X
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 126K times each, and 1.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 101x its own typical post.
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #mexico.
Compared with accounts its own size
Insane Reality Leaks's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.076%, Insane Reality Leaks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 2026101x their median
Jenna Ortega 1 year transformation 👀 https://t.co/eGZeYtiJrI
- Aug 12, 202387x their median
Simulation shows what happens to human body in a submersible implosion https://t.co/yJvUMCzlWp
- Aug 3, 202674x their median
A$AP Rocky takes back offer to work with graphic designer after they publicly shared his private DM “This is just distasteful. Well I guess we won’t be working, best of luck buddy” https://t.co/x0RisUus03
- Aug 10, 202640x their median
The fact he asked for permission first makes this 10x funnier 💀 https://t.co/zDLUun8jIF
- Jun 19, 202540x their median
Definition of risking it all for a few minutes 🤣 https://t.co/MnvYzp2mFJ
- Jun 24, 202540x their median
Prime example of not dying for jewelry 💯 https://t.co/mthD6JoeF6
- Aug 24, 202635x their median
🚨🚨💢 La police brésilienne 🇧🇷 a enfin capturé avec humour ce grand bandit armé qui était longtemps recherché. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/Y8WiIs5WWO
- Aug 4, 202627x their median
Florida man is behind bars awaiting trial after allegedly killing a woman who traveled from the United Kingdom and agreed to pay him $4,000 to carry out her fantasy of being sexually abused, tortured, and murdered. https://t.co/sKQXB5oJ1C
- Aug 13, 202625x their median
Paul Walker was 33 when he began dating Jasmine Pilchard-Gosnell, who was only 16. The two remained together for roughly seven years, until Walker's death in 2013. https://t.co/tDs3CjXyi6
- Aug 28, 202615x their median
He definitely didn’t expect a camera to be rollin https://t.co/rjAnfcvAeB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 126K times each, and 1.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 101x its own typical post.
- What is Insane Reality Leaks's engagement rate on X?
- Insane Reality Leaks (@InsaneReality) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 68 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,504,629 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.076%, Insane Reality Leaks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @InsaneReality have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @InsaneReality post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.53 posts per day across the measured window.