Back to @IngloriousBhere's profile

IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS engagement report

@IngloriousBhere - 143K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.48%
of 143K followers
Per impression
4.04%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
36.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 1.48%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.48%, IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 327 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20262.4x their median

    I need prayer warriors right now! 🙏🏼 My husband, John, has been taken back for a cat-scan as he was having symptoms of a stroke. Please pray he is ok. I can’t live without him. 🥺 https://t.co/MNa35ZxzmG

    3.3K4021.2K7162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.8x their median

    No $$$ at the ⛽️ could ever sway me to vote for a Democrat! 💋✌🏻🇺🇸 https://t.co/4DqZHNbXjq

    2.8K4875332553K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    The average IQ of Somalia is 68 https://t.co/0FNpntibKy

    1.7K4561734168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Hey @grok…. Yes or no? Is it a CRIME to be a gay person in Gaza? If yes, can you notify @PeteButtigieg and advise him not to travel there?

    1.9K152112789K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    "The people claiming to fight on behalf of black people for race relations are more interested in perpetuating racial animosity in this country [for a paycheck]." https://t.co/HM7DrigZHO

    1.6K441551320K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    This is EXACTLY why the Term Limits conversation isn’t going away. A real take on leadership, accountability, and what voters deserve! 😎 https://t.co/hRN3X4EzGn

    514175861352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    One of the worst @SecVetAffairs in American history has an approval rating that reflects his record. Our veterans deserve better than Doug Collins. https://t.co/rKx7n0ow13

    551818514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Veteran Action Releases Video Campaign Highlighting Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks' Stellar Record on Veterans "Mariannette Miller-Meeks is the biggest champion veterans have in Congress," said Mark Lucas, founder and president of Veteran Action. "She consistently leads on veterans issues. Her 24 years in the Army and her experience as a physician make her an incredible advocate for veterans." @RepMMM introduced the Veterans' Bill of Rights Act, which requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to clearly inform veterans of their rights to care, benefits, dignity and informed consent. She supports the Veterans' ACCESS Act to strengthen VA community care. She also backs the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, a package of more than 60 bipartisan bills that expands health care, benefits and support for veterans, survivors, caregivers and military families. Voters in both parties back these bills. A national Honest Poll survey of 1,633 registered voters, commissioned by Veteran Action, finds 85% of voters support the Veterans' ACCESS Act and 83% support the Veterans' Bill of Rights Act. Support tops 80% among both Republicans and Democrats for each bill. Asked about the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, 62% of voters say they are more likely to back a candidate who supports it, and 11% say they are less likely. Veteran Action recently endorsed Miller-Meeks and Rep. Zach Nunn for reelection. About Veteran Action Veteran Action is an organization that advocates for America First policies that strengthen national security and provide unwavering support for America's veterans.

    45123712K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 1.48%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

What is IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS's engagement rate on X?
IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS (@IngloriousBhere) has an engagement rate of 1.48%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,347 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.48%, IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IngloriousBhere have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IngloriousBhere post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going