IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS engagement report
@IngloriousBhere - 143K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 1.48%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.48%, IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 327 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 23, 20262.4x their median
I need prayer warriors right now! 🙏🏼 My husband, John, has been taken back for a cat-scan as he was having symptoms of a stroke. Please pray he is ok. I can’t live without him. 🥺 https://t.co/MNa35ZxzmG
- Sep 21, 20261.8x their median
No $$$ at the ⛽️ could ever sway me to vote for a Democrat! 💋✌🏻🇺🇸 https://t.co/4DqZHNbXjq
- Sep 23, 2026
The average IQ of Somalia is 68 https://t.co/0FNpntibKy
- Sep 21, 2026
Hey @grok…. Yes or no? Is it a CRIME to be a gay person in Gaza? If yes, can you notify @PeteButtigieg and advise him not to travel there?
- Sep 23, 2026
"The people claiming to fight on behalf of black people for race relations are more interested in perpetuating racial animosity in this country [for a paycheck]." https://t.co/HM7DrigZHO
- Sep 16, 2026
This is EXACTLY why the Term Limits conversation isn’t going away. A real take on leadership, accountability, and what voters deserve! 😎 https://t.co/hRN3X4EzGn
- Sep 22, 2026
One of the worst @SecVetAffairs in American history has an approval rating that reflects his record. Our veterans deserve better than Doug Collins. https://t.co/rKx7n0ow13
- Sep 24, 2026
Veteran Action Releases Video Campaign Highlighting Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks' Stellar Record on Veterans "Mariannette Miller-Meeks is the biggest champion veterans have in Congress," said Mark Lucas, founder and president of Veteran Action. "She consistently leads on veterans issues. Her 24 years in the Army and her experience as a physician make her an incredible advocate for veterans." @RepMMM introduced the Veterans' Bill of Rights Act, which requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to clearly inform veterans of their rights to care, benefits, dignity and informed consent. She supports the Veterans' ACCESS Act to strengthen VA community care. She also backs the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, a package of more than 60 bipartisan bills that expands health care, benefits and support for veterans, survivors, caregivers and military families. Voters in both parties back these bills. A national Honest Poll survey of 1,633 registered voters, commissioned by Veteran Action, finds 85% of voters support the Veterans' ACCESS Act and 83% support the Veterans' Bill of Rights Act. Support tops 80% among both Republicans and Democrats for each bill. Asked about the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, 62% of voters say they are more likely to back a candidate who supports it, and 11% say they are less likely. Veteran Action recently endorsed Miller-Meeks and Rep. Zach Nunn for reelection. About Veteran Action Veteran Action is an organization that advocates for America First policies that strengthen national security and provide unwavering support for America's veterans.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 1.48%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.
- What is IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS's engagement rate on X?
- IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS (@IngloriousBhere) has an engagement rate of 1.48%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,347 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.48%, IngloriousBhere🇺🇸🇮🇱MAGA1776🇬🇧DEMSareNAZIS sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @IngloriousBhere have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @IngloriousBhere post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.