Back to @IngaSpringe's profile

Inga Springe engagement report

@IngaSpringe - 58K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.025%
of 58K followers
Per impression
0.486%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
5.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.486% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 259 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Inga Springe's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Inga Springe sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 286 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 202619x their median

    Vietējā elite diemžēl gadiem atbalstījusi Jūlijas Stepaņenko politisko karjeru, bet tagad pauž izbrīnu, kā viņai izdevies iegūt tādu popularitāti.   Stepaņenko (toreiz SC/GKR) Latvijas politikā ienāca pa ļoti skaidru ceļu. Viņa tā arī būtu palikusi politikas perifērijā, ja vien 2015. gadā nebūtu radusi atbalstu Nacionālajā apvienībā un citās pamatstraumes partijās savām “tikumības” iniciatīvām Saeimā.   Pēc tam Stepaņenko savā paspārnē paņēma Ainārs Šlesers, izvirzot par Valsts prezidenta amata kandidāti.   Jau toreiz bija daudzi, kas brīdināja, ka Stepaņenko sludinātā ideoloģija ir kā no Kremļa rokasgrāmatas. Bet veltīgi. Un te nu esam. Cerams, ka šoreiz dienesti savu darbu izdarīs.

    1983324418K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202611x their median

    Lielajām platformām būs jāveic ieguldījumi Latvijas kino industrijā - valdība šodien atbalstīja tā saukto “Netflix” nodokli. Pēc pieticīgām aplēsēm tie būs vismaz 600 000 eiro gadā - vai nu kā tiešie maksājumi vai pašu ieguldījums filmu uzņemšanā. Šis likumprojekts bija jau izstrādāts 2023.gada septembrī, taču mainoties valdībai un Kultūras ministrijā nonākot Progresīvajiem, tā virzība diemžēl sāka buksēt un pēc būtības apstājās. Tagad, lieki nekavējoties, šo jautājumu izdevies ne tikai aktualizēt, bet arī apstiprināt Ministru kabinetā. https://t.co/I8N8mSAsOz

    116199724K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20266.2x their median

    📍 Nelegālie migranti ierodas pa pazemes tuneli – tā ir ziņa. Notikums, kas ir noticis. 📍 Ministrs un Rīgas vicemērs dodas reidā uz kebabnīcām – tas jau ir politiķu pašu radīts notikums, kuru pēc tam var izmantot savā komunikācijā. Vairāk: https://t.co/BNuCbxDFRO https://t.co/cZ6Ig9MJwr

    3834429.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20265.5x their median

    📍 Vai zini, kas ir troļļa konts? Troļļa konts = to vada cilvēks kāda uzdevumā. Bots = automātiski radīts konts. Anonīms konts automātiski nenozīmē troļļa konts. Nozīme ir motivācijā. Paldies @ivchix , kas atklāja "Annu". https://t.co/fNBHbVjrum

    41327619K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.9x their median

    ✍️ Man ar Jāni Dombravu ir kas kopīgs – abi esam pret “masveida migrāciju”. Un vispār, vai Latvijā ir kāds, kurš ir par? Domāju, neviens. Tādēļ kā žurnāliste kļūstu piesardzīga, kad dzirdu šo frāzi no konservatīvā spārna politiķiem. Sīkāk: https://t.co/yoUCIgN4hB https://t.co/lu91vmNh9o

    4461538.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20264.9x their median

    Vai "Rīdzenes" sarunas ir īstas? Kad Valdis Zatlers ierosināja atlaist Saeimu, "Ir" žurnālistei Evelīnai Paulai Vāverei bija tikai astoņi gadi. 3. oktobrī viņa ies vēlēt Saeimu, tāpēc palūdza "Ir" komentētājam Paulam Raudsepam izskaidrot, kas notika 2011. gadā, ko oligarhi runāja viesnīcā Rīdzene un kāpēc tas joprojām ir svarīgi. Kur lasīt oligarhu sarunas? 📲 brīvpieejā https://t.co/GX8sdAP7Wn 🗞️ žurnāla "Ir" speciālizlaidumā, kas pieejams preses tirdzniecības vietās

    43119519K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.4x their median

    📍 Zinu, kā jūtas NVO, jo mediji jau gadiem ir peramā zēna vietā. Problēma: daļa politiķu ir apguvuši, kā strādā algoritms. NVO, akadēmija, daļa mediju un pozīcijas politiķu nē. Vairāk: https://t.co/cZUgQ4B04E https://t.co/1VraGb6ENA

    32325212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20263.4x their median

    ✍️ "Kuce", "kundzīte", "čekiste".. - šos komentārus saņēmu pie video, kurā aicinu piedalīties nodarbībā. Ko es darīju? Teju neko. Šādu komentāru bija ap 100, bet 500 nospieda👍. Pārdevu visvairāk biļešu. Daudzus attur negatīvi komentāri, bet velti. Sīkāk: https://t.co/wxBktquQ86 https://t.co/pkMmNEfiEi

    3001805.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.4x their median

    💡 Ko politiķi dara. 📍 Ne tikai reaģē uz notikumiem, bet paši rada notikumus un izplata. 📍 Izvēlas tēmas, kas izraisa bailes, dusmas, apdraudējumu, “mēs pret viņiem”. 📍Atkārto tēmu, līdz rodas sajūta, ka tā ir viena no galvenajām valsts problēmām. https://t.co/gczRBpkMyZ https://t.co/rdEKOFeaNm

    2132125.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.4x their median

    🤔 Kā labāk latviskot "slopaganda"? Angliski tas ir divu vārdu salikums. "AI slop" - ar MI ātri un lēti saražots saturs, un "propaganda". ChatGPT piedāvā: "mēslpropaganda", "šļurpropaganda" - neviens īsti labi neskan. Kalambūrs. https://t.co/Pdc5Dr4qFZ

    26218112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.486% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 259 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Inga Springe's engagement rate on X?
Inga Springe (@IngaSpringe) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 57,663 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Inga Springe sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IngaSpringe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IngaSpringe post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going