Back to @InformaCosmos's profile

Informa Cosmos engagement report

@InformaCosmos - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 216 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
1.32%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
2.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
375
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.73/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 375 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 216 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 216 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 216 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Informa Cosmos's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, Informa Cosmos sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 481 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202626x their median

    LO ÚLTIMO: 𝕏 ha añadido una animación de Me gusta por el evento de Apple de hoy. #Appleevent https://t.co/IshoqxYB6n

    9.7K4837133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202614x their median

    🇺🇸 LO ÚLTIMO: Jacob Coxon, investigador de Anthropic, renunció a la compañía y advirtió que la carrera hacia la superinteligencia podría "eliminarnos a todos" antes de 2030. Coxon dijo que Anthropic y OpenAI están avanzando hacia sistemas de IA capaces de mejorarse a sí mismos y acusó a las empresas de estar "apostando nuestras vidas". Según él, quienes construyen estos modelos creen en privado que la inteligencia artificial podría matar a todos los humanos antes del final de la década. La advertencia fue respaldada por Evan Hubinger, responsable de Alignment Science en Anthropic, quien afirmó que esa preocupación es real y estimó el riesgo en más del 10% durante los próximos diez años. El caso no prueba que exista una fecha de extinción ni que ese escenario vaya a ocurrir. Pero sí muestra que investigadores dentro de la industria están alertando públicamente sobre los riesgos de una superinteligencia fuera de control.

    4.0K1.2K119133172K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202613x their median

    🇷🇺 LO ÚLTIMO: Cerca de 200 personas fueron puestas bajo aislamiento médico en Rusia tras la muerte de una investigadora de 28 años que trabajaba en un instituto especializado en enfermedades peligrosas, cerca de Irkutsk. La mujer había informado que rompió accidentalmente un tubo con muestras biológicas días antes de enfermar. Posteriormente desarrolló una neumonía grave y murió a comienzos de octubre. Las autoridades rusas hablan oficialmente de una "neumonía de origen desconocido". Aunque funcionarios locales mencionaron la posibilidad de peste, hasta ahora no se ha confirmado la causa ni existe un brote declarado.

    3.8K7911091681.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202612x their median

    🇺🇸 LO ÚLTIMO: Un hombre de Florida famoso por su parecido a Epstein viajó a Israel para hacerse una prueba de ADN y demostrar que no es Jeffrey Epstein. https://t.co/Vg4R06HJXX

    4.2K2099838126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202612x their median

    🇵🇪🇻🇦 | Según Latina Noticias de Perú, el médico neumólogo, Hebert Cuenca, señaló que hay estudios que relacionan el adenocarcinoma, tipo de cáncer de pulmón detectado y extirpado al papa León XIV este martes 13 de octubre en Roma, con el consumo de agua que no está debidamente tratada, lo cual ocurre en muchas zonas del país: "El adenocarcinoma no está asociado al cigarro, sino a lugares con aguas contaminadas con ciertas sustancias químicas. Hay cierta relación, en un grupo pequeño nada más, cuando la gente vive en provincia, como en la sierra. Se han hecho estudios en partes de sierra donde la gente toma agua de la laguna o agua de subsuelos, que es agua no al 100% limpia o purificada, entonces puede entrar al organismo un poco de sustancias químicas que pueden producir en el paciente un adenocarcinoma pulmonar", remarcó el especialista en entrevista con Latina Noticias.

    3.6K61013384373K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202611x their median

    🌌 LO ÚLTIMO: Una gran alineación planetaria ocurrirá este 12 de agosto antes del amanecer, cuando 6 planetas aparecerán distribuidos a lo largo del cielo matutino. Mercurio, Marte, Júpiter, Saturno, Urano y Neptuno formarán parte de este desfile celeste. No estarán en una línea perfecta, pero sí se verán ubicados sobre la misma franja imaginaria por donde se mueven el Sol, la Luna y los planetas. Marte y Saturno serán los más fáciles de observar a simple vista. Mercurio y Júpiter estarán más cerca del horizonte, por lo que será clave mirar antes de que el cielo empiece a aclarar y desde un lugar con vista despejada hacia el este. Urano requerirá prismáticos y Neptuno solo podrá verse con telescopio. Aun así, ver dos o tres planetas ya será suficiente para presenciar uno de los eventos astronómicos más destacados de agosto.

    3.0K1.1K265586K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.8x their median

    LO ÚLTMO: Descubren en Bolivia una nueva especie de gato, la primera identificada en más de 100 años. El gato tigre tilcayo salió a la luz después de que un hombre lo confundiera con un gatito doméstico y lo llevara a un santuario local. https://t.co/OBOsqdNZLi

    2.8K452233377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20268.1x their median

    🚨INDIGNANTE: El atleta ucraniano Vadym Oliynyk y su pareja enfrentan una investigación en Omán por maltratar a una tortuga marina. En el video aparecen sentados sobre el animal mientras luchaba por escapar. https://t.co/ViJQYAQZiv

    2.2K73811834127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20267.7x their median

    ¿Sabías que dentro de Minecraft existe una enorme biblioteca donde puedes leer información que está censurada en diferentes países del mundo? 📚🌍 Se llama The Uncensored Library, un proyecto creado en 2020 por Reporteros Sin Fronteras (RSF) para promover la libertad de prensa y el acceso a la información. Su objetivo es permitir que las personas puedan leer artículos y reportajes restringidos en sus países, aprovechando que Minecraft sigue disponible en lugares donde algunos medios están bloqueados. Diseñada por BlockWorks, DDB Berlin y Media.Monks, esta biblioteca virtual cuenta con salas dedicadas a países como México, Rusia, Irán, Brasil y, desde 2026, Estados Unidos. En su interior, los reportajes se convierten en libros que cualquier jugador puede leer libremente. Desde su lanzamiento, el proyecto ha recibido importantes reconocimientos, incluido un premio Peabody en 2022. Además, continúa ampliándose y se utiliza para enseñar a las nuevas generaciones la importancia de la libertad de prensa. ✨ Una biblioteca dentro de un videojuego que demuestra que la información puede encontrar nuevos caminos para llegar a las personas.

    2.4K45511741K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20267.4x their median

    Hoy, 22 de septiembre, se celebra el Día de Apreciación del Elefante, una fecha para conocer un poco más sobre estos animales. Los elefantes forman familias muy unidas, se comunican de distintas maneras y pueden mantener fuertes vínculos durante años. https://t.co/4Q3qwrN8KV

    2.3K419102026K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 375 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 216 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 216 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Informa Cosmos's engagement rate on X?
Informa Cosmos (@InformaCosmos) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 216 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,185,263 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, Informa Cosmos sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @InformaCosmos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @InformaCosmos post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going