IncomeSharks engagement report
@IncomeSharks - 740K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 565 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
IncomeSharks's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.076%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 180 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 20263.8x their median
If total crypto marketcap closes above the green line that confirms what many are saying that we are indeed back in a crypto bull market. Probably takes a few attempts but a very pivotal point in the market. https://t.co/Gh891n16h1
- Sep 3, 20263.7x their median
Don't forget your goal is to leave the crypto casino and the real flex is walking away with profits not unrealized screenshots. Greed and addiction will continue to change the number you will be happy with and it's why so many get stuck in a never ending dopamine cycle.
- Aug 24, 20263.3x their median
$ETH - Kind of a similar setup as last time if this is the bottom. Would be happy for an acceleration straight to $3k but consolidation would actually be bullish to build a new base. This is usually how the market gets people to close longs before the next move up by chopping. https://t.co/PgWrI1Rsyp
- Aug 24, 20263.1x their median
Nice to see half a trillion dollars show up in the crypto market in a matter of weeks. The pattern clearly broken and if the red line breaks out I don't think there's any way you can still be skeptical of the move. https://t.co/QHaBc824Cd
- Sep 22, 20263.1x their median
$ETH - Original squiggles still spot on. This is where I want to call it good and delete the rest but will leave them. Hopefully we don't have a lower fakeout still on the table. https://t.co/iY6JRnx27a
- Sep 2, 20263.0x their median
$ETH - So much in crypto happens in short periods of time and the rest is spent waiting. https://t.co/ItbkghEBnG
- Aug 19, 20262.6x their median
Crypto has my attention again but the reality is without continuation this pump means nothing other than short term excitement. Stocks make moves like this daily so in order to get liquidity back it needs to accelerate here not stall/retrace. ETF inflows a great sign though.
- Mar 24, 20262.5x their median
I'm looking forward to one of the months this year where crypto will be up only and make up for the suffering it puts us through. Then it'll be boring for months after and people will overtrade and give back profits but it'll be a great time.
- Aug 25, 20262.4x their median
Don't waste time mourning missed opportunities or losses. Traders that live in the past will never have a successful future. Miss 99 opportunities? Who cares, you could retire on the 100th opportunity you take.
- Sep 5, 20262.4x their median
Being early to a trend or narrative means you have to be ok constantly missing out on new ones and being comfortable being wrong for long periods of time. Your goal is to be right with conviction one time, that's often all that's needed for life changing money.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 565 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.
- What is IncomeSharks's engagement rate on X?
- IncomeSharks (@IncomeSharks) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 740,212 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.076%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @IncomeSharks have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @IncomeSharks post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.