Back to @IncomeSharks's profile

IncomeSharks engagement report

@IncomeSharks - 740K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.076%
of 740K followers
Per impression
0.79%
72K views on a typical post
Reach
9.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
565
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
31 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 565 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

IncomeSharks's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.076%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 180 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 20263.8x their median

    If total crypto marketcap closes above the green line that confirms what many are saying that we are indeed back in a crypto bull market. Probably takes a few attempts but a very pivotal point in the market. https://t.co/Gh891n16h1

    1.9K155934121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.7x their median

    Don't forget your goal is to leave the crypto casino and the real flex is walking away with profits not unrealized screenshots. Greed and addiction will continue to change the number you will be happy with and it's why so many get stuck in a never ending dopamine cycle.

    1.9K9279891K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.3x their median

    $ETH - Kind of a similar setup as last time if this is the bottom. Would be happy for an acceleration straight to $3k but consolidation would actually be bullish to build a new base. This is usually how the market gets people to close longs before the next move up by chopping. https://t.co/PgWrI1Rsyp

    1.7K107925803K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.1x their median

    Nice to see half a trillion dollars show up in the crypto market in a matter of weeks. The pattern clearly broken and if the red line breaks out I don't think there's any way you can still be skeptical of the move. https://t.co/QHaBc824Cd

    1.6K90757105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.1x their median

    $ETH - Original squiggles still spot on. This is where I want to call it good and delete the rest but will leave them. Hopefully we don't have a lower fakeout still on the table. https://t.co/iY6JRnx27a

    1.5K9411114148K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    $ETH - So much in crypto happens in short periods of time and the rest is spent waiting. https://t.co/ItbkghEBnG

    1.5K105865118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.6x their median

    Crypto has my attention again but the reality is without continuation this pump means nothing other than short term excitement. Stocks make moves like this daily so in order to get liquidity back it needs to accelerate here not stall/retrace. ETF inflows a great sign though.

    1.4K3466189K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20262.5x their median

    I'm looking forward to one of the months this year where crypto will be up only and make up for the suffering it puts us through. Then it'll be boring for months after and people will overtrade and give back profits but it'll be a great time.

    1.3K39763118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.4x their median

    Don't waste time mourning missed opportunities or losses. Traders that live in the past will never have a successful future. Miss 99 opportunities? Who cares, you could retire on the 100th opportunity you take.

    1.2K114441492K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.4x their median

    Being early to a trend or narrative means you have to be ok constantly missing out on new ones and being comfortable being wrong for long periods of time. Your goal is to be right with conviction one time, that's often all that's needed for life changing money.

    1.2K80831486K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 565 interactions against 740K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is IncomeSharks's engagement rate on X?
IncomeSharks (@IncomeSharks) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 740,212 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.076%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IncomeSharks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IncomeSharks post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going