Back to @Incentiv_net's profile

Incentiv engagement report

@Incentiv_net - 275K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.135%
of 275K followers
Per impression
3.11%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
372
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.135%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Incentiv's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.135%, Incentiv sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 229 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 4, 20265.6x their median

    Incentiv Mainnet is LIVE! From this moment on, every action moves you forward. XP engine. Epochs. Onchain progression baked directly into the chain. Enter today → https://t.co/WzGqtGWtry https://t.co/vOIYkrP7Xq

    1.1K44567830477K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20261.5x their median

    Decentralised simplified access. https://t.co/R6J8BE1ojP

    25416719246.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.6x their median

    A new look for Incentiv’s next chapter. Where human intent and AI action power a shared economy. Discover the vision → https://t.co/zG5M2rbcjM https://t.co/MNUbe116mn

    341101154575K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20261.6x their median

    CENT IS GOING LIVE IN 24 HOURS. → Pair: USDT/CENT → Trading opens Mon 12 Oct, 09:00 UTC → On @Gate, @MEXC and @kucoincom Official announcements ↓ https://t.co/wJngh1PNDR

    372701152954K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 2026

    good infrastructure goes invisible in your day-to-day. https://t.co/WzGqtGWtry https://t.co/APN1Y9KtCT

    240142170012K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 2026

    look closer. everything in the incentiv city runs on the same thing. you. https://t.co/uiUXzy7Ynb

    265127145113K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 2026

    trapping user capital inside an ecosystem is a flawed design choice. a healthy network relies on freedom of movement. that voluntary mobility is what drives deep liquidity concentration and real network fees. drop part 2 is live on https://t.co/d36diwpYEK https://t.co/7e3LJ6LUee

    236142156312K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    legacy reward systems give you two buttons. hold or dump. incentiv lets you choose how you claim. liquid now, or bond it straight into the paymaster to cover gas. centi breaks down every path in discord ➔ https://t.co/d36diwpYEK https://t.co/A1N1X32Ur9

    229139162313K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026

    incentiv is built around a simple idea: the network should work for the people actually using it. it runs on a value-fee feedback loop, so the value moving across the network keeps flowing back to active users. full breakdown & live answers dropping. https://t.co/d36diwpYEK 🫧 https://t.co/jnAxqsBLjD

    23113616415.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026

    centi’s never been in a rush. the things worth keeping take a minute to settle in. keep an eye on the portal. ready up. https://t.co/Khkazt6N2Z

    23413515516.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.135%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.

What is Incentiv's engagement rate on X?
Incentiv (@Incentiv_net) has an engagement rate of 0.135%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 275,078 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.135%, Incentiv sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Incentiv_net have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Incentiv_net post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going