Inc. engagement report
@Inc - 2.6M followers on X
Measured over 190 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 2.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 190 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.079% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.146% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 190 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 181 interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inc5000, #yournextmove.
Measured over 190 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #inc5000, #yournextmove.
Compared with accounts its own size
Inc.'s engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, Inc. sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 1% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 99% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 146 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 19, 202660x their median
EasyA co-founders Phil and Dom Kwok funded growth with upfront payments from companies like Ripple and Google, and kept 100 percent of the equity. https://t.co/93Hblt6Prm
- Aug 21, 202622x their median
Jeff Bezos says the choices that shape your life become clearer when you stop thinking about today and start thinking about your future self. https://t.co/T1C2Wl69NG
- Oct 2, 20268.0x their median
The Neuralink executive shared private messages between her and Musk on X in an announcement of their split. https://t.co/DnFc2nQkQa
- Sep 12, 20265.7x their median
Tim Cook has called the memory shortage a 'hundred-year flood.' Here's how Apple is handling it as other companies struggle. https://t.co/cIoiWyBqNB
- Oct 14, 20265.0x their median
De-extinction firm Colossal Biosciences has unveiled GenoMorph, an AI tool that identifies key DNA targets to fast-track the return of the dodo. https://t.co/bDLIoCjrIK
- Sep 21, 20265.0x their median
'Remote work substantially increases isolation and worsens mental health ...' https://t.co/PTlyuwtfHx
- Oct 18, 20264.7x their median
An AI model like this 'would be challenging to shut down,' Anthropic says. https://t.co/Qk43iGBzX9
- Sep 25, 20264.7x their median
A 95,000-person shows getting more REM sleep lowers the risk of dozens of diseases. So does getting more deep sleep. https://t.co/gvtYlW8dtZ
- Sep 14, 20264.3x their median
The strongest leaders know that great teams require both accountability and psychological safety. https://t.co/xUaRCd5LfS
- Sep 30, 20264.0x their median
How do emotionally intelligent people use artificial intelligence? In three words: with extreme caution. https://t.co/wKELlEpPHq
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 2.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 190 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.079% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.146% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 190 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 181 interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inc5000, #yournextmove.
- What is Inc.'s engagement rate on X?
- Inc. (@Inc) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 190 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,614,104 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, Inc. sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Inc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Inc post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.5 posts per day across the measured window.