Back to @In2ThinAir's profile

In2ThinAir engagement report

@In2ThinAir - 181K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 181K followers
Per impression
1.34%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
91
interactions (median)
Saved
0.132%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 581x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

In2ThinAir's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, In2ThinAir sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 238 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 2026581x their median

    Remember when they tried to replace Charlie with this toolbag just one week after the assassination? https://t.co/V2vuS9gfRY

    49K2.3K1.2K13613M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026109x their median

    He did not trip and fall. He’s not even walking. He collapsed. https://t.co/BZr1gDB4qL

    7.1K1.8K870205436K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 202647x their median

    🚨MANY are claiming that this is NOT Donald Trump! WHY is he using a 'Body Double" 🤯 *WATCH CLOSE* This may become a much bigger deal then you know! and how he is reenacting common Trump mannerisms and movements! CREEPY! Also attending "Donald Trump" his son Eric behind bulletproof glass to watch LIV Golf event in Virginia... days after telling players to rejoin the PGA Tour

    3.0K611606811.1M viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 202524x their median

    BREAKING! This Charlie Kirk video is some of the BEST evidence we have! 29 Min of NON STOP coverage. 12:13pm to 12:42pm on 9/10/25. Charlie was shot at 12:23:29pm. This has 90% of the answers we need. Each voice, each movement each frame will be dissected! Original video posted by Blake Bednarz on X!

    2.7K35413328436K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202628x their median

    🚨WHO IS THIS GUY? - He's Casually walking into campus after Charlie kirk is assassinated. *I'm not aware of anyone else mentioning him but worth a look!* -Very similar build. -Similar face & height. -Were there multiple decoys for this event? https://t.co/a4nKNMxPmx

    2.0K39012519122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202624x their median

    🚨Charlie Kirk assassination UPDATE! AI images being used to offset the real story?? LOOK what we found! 👇 https://t.co/P6KogXrChq

    1.7K39614816112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202623x their median

    Nick Fuentes GOES OFF on Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson for pinning Charlie Kirk’s аѕѕаѕѕіոаtіоո on Israel “The right-wing can never forgive Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson—The left lives to fight and k*ӏӏ another day because of what YOU PEOPLE did!” https://t.co/fzd6XJeLjb

    1.5K15635156524K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202618x their median

    Hey @TPUSA Your total silence on the Erika Kirk live-TV clip is loud as hell. Everyone saw it. Eye roll. Swallow. Right there on national TV. Extremely rare moment and you all acted like it never happened. Yet the second anyone else steps out of line your staff floods the replies with CIA textbook comments, straight-up lies, or insults. One of you even dropped a drunk insult on this exact video… then deleted it the second the notification went out. So which is it? Was that coke? Some other substance? A twitch? An illness starting to show? Or just pure unfiltered reaction she didn’t mean for the cameras to catch? You watched it. She watched it. Not one explanation. Not one attempt. Just crickets. Funny how fast the scripts come out for everything else… but this one gets the silent treatment. Almost like certain things are off-limits. Explain it. Or keep proving the point.

    1.3K24710017228K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202618x their median

    🚨WARNING this may be disturbing to you normal reality! -In MY opinion THIS is one of the big reason CERN was shut down. In 2025 Gabriel Diallo hits a tennis ball LIVE on national TV… and it goes STRAIGHT THROUGH the net like the court is a fucking hologram! 🤯 Media: “Oh it just slipped through a tiny gap lol” Sure. Keep gaslighting yourselves. The simulation glitched in front of millions and they still won’t say the quiet part out loud.

    1.3K289449146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202618x their median

    ‼️Rapper Boosie Badazz Just IMPLICATED Erika Kirk In A $600,000 Pay To Play PARDON SCHEME https://t.co/YrXNZGSqkH

    1.3K2694310100K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 581x its own typical post.

What is In2ThinAir's engagement rate on X?
In2ThinAir (@In2ThinAir) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 181,007 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, In2ThinAir sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @In2ThinAir have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @In2ThinAir post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going