Back to @Imaginary_Ones's profile

Imaginary Ones | Bubio.ai engagement report

@Imaginary_Ones - 890K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.013%
of 890K followers
Per impression
0.604%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
2.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.604% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 156x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Imaginary Ones | Bubio.ai sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 30, 2026156x their median

    This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now. “Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”

    13K1.3K1.2K3.5K8.1M viewsView on X
  • May 29, 202518x their median

    🌟 A New Chapter of Imagination with https://t.co/XSf3bhOFca 🌟 Imagine millions of your favorite characters, companions, IPs and famous personalities coming alive as your friends. Ready to chat, connect, share unforgettable moments, and create stories with you. Bubio is an AI character chat 💬 platform where you can imagine, create, and grow with a universe of AI-powered companions. Whether you dream of anime best friends, fantasy heroes, romantic partners, or entirely original personas you design, Bubio makes AI feel personal and full of heart. 🎁 Sign up early for the waitlist and receive FREE Soul Seeds. 💫 Your characters are waiting → https://t.co/cBY7kElqOM ✨ Like, retweet, and join the waitlist for a chance to win an Imaginary Ones NFT. Join us and unlock a new world of possibilities with AI characters.

    1.3K63933812146K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20264.8x their median

    Meet IO-7. 🫧 An AI film on @Imaginary_Ones Made on @Bubioai https://t.co/qYFkJYTPMV

    25543761229K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20262.2x their median

    We teamed up with talented AI artist @timikareem to bring the Imaginary Ones genesis story to life. Built with @BubioAI, this is our first step into longer-form AI storytelling. Imagination has always been our core, and we’re starting to see what's possible. Would you watch an AI film?

    1694150712K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20262.3x their median

    An imaginary Ones film. The vision of Bubio, powering up imagination is getting closer everyday. wen movie? https://t.co/qtGkoHePGd

    14025182532K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    🫧 The Imaginary world is expanding. 🫧 We’re partnering with @unvault to bring IO across 8 blockchains, giving holders more places to trade and new communities a way into our world. Global IP. Omnichain IO. LFB! 🫡 https://t.co/Ugs1QYHoi1

    1024126326K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20262.1x their median

    Did you know that Codex can make videos? I created a self updating skill to make incredible videos using Seedance 2 on https://t.co/iITdz2Vusx. Trained it on hundreds of Seedance videos and prompts. You just give it a rough idea, Codex does the rest. It checks its memory for the best possible prompt framework + creates its own reference images, goes to @Bubioai , submits its prompt and reference images. When the video is done it : - Returns it back to you in chat - Self critiques the video - Update’s its memory on what it did right and what it can improve. So as it creates more videos, they’ll continue to improve. Set a heartbeat and you’ll autonomously get consistent quality content! Connect it to your socials and you’ll have constant content without lifting a finger. This is probably the coolest thing I’ve built with Codex! Codex really can do anything!

    116223027.0K viewsView on X
  • May 16, 20261.9x their median

    Made a video about @Imaginary_Ones using @Bubioai Will drop it soon You must watch it.🫧 https://t.co/iKzfDQUKRk

    1041432310K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20261.9x their median

    Attention is the new currency. So who’s capturing it best? 🎙️ This week’s Space: Attention Is the New Alpha. In a world flooded with AI, ads, and endless content, attention has become one of the most valuable assets online. What actually cuts through the noise now? 🗣️ Panel: @poktnetwork | @Imaginary_Ones | @Bubioai 🎙️ Hosted by @RikwijkV & @leagueoftraders 📅 Thu, May 28, 2026 | 2 PM UTC 🔔 Join us: https://t.co/M1xon8Kuqq 🎁 We’ll also be doing a LIVE giveaway during the Space — tune in, like & RT this post for a chance to win.

    684925727K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 2026

    We’ve arrived in Hong Kong! 🇭🇰 The @MyLittlePony x Imaginary Ones plushies are now available across multiple locations. Including Hong Kong International Airport and Kowloon High-Speed Rail Station . Let’s bubble the world with magic 🫧🦄 https://t.co/OPYL8gDaNx

    88342078.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.604% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 156x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Imaginary Ones | Bubio.ai's engagement rate on X?
Imaginary Ones | Bubio.ai (@Imaginary_Ones) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 890,421 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Imaginary Ones | Bubio.ai sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Imaginary_Ones have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Imaginary_Ones post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going