Back to @ImMeme0's profile

I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ engagement report

@ImMeme0 - 885K followers on X

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.136%
of 885K followers
Per impression
4.08%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
3.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.146%
43 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.9/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 885K followers, an engagement rate of 0.136%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 4.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #riseup, #flyhigh, #soareagles.

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #riseup, #flyhigh, #soareagles.

Compared with accounts its own size

I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.136%, I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20266.7x their median

    Large online female community has launched a coordinated TikTok movement in support of Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother charged with strangling her three young children. Participants are declaring their allegiance from whatever state they’re in, using β€œLabour,” already an anthem in anti-patriarchy circles, as their soundtrack. Many portray Clancy not as a woman whose defense cites severe postpartum psychosis, but as an almost certain victim of her husband, whom they insist must be the real perpetrator. As a woman who lived through postpartum distress, I find this response terrifying and disgusting. The willingness of so many, especially those identifying as medical professionals, to rush to exonerate or romanticize a mother accused of killing her own children reveals a chilling inversion of priorities. The children’s lives seem almost incidental compared with the ideological need to protect a narrative of female victimhood. When the defense itself centers on the mother’s mental state at the time of the acts, the leap to β€œshe is innocent and he did it” is not solidarity. It is denial dressed up as feminism. I would not trust any of these women within five feet of a child.

    5.1K1.1K1.5K366456K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.5x their median

    After an unhinged lunatic vandalized their door, this pathetic, woke Portland coffee shop is online begging its followers for money because they don’t want to file a police report and get her in trouble. This is what progressive suicide empathy looks like. https://t.co/AV1g53CoGq

    6.4K1.2K2023160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.2x their median

    Woman in NYC faces online backlash for wearing flip-flops after saying she stepped in human feces on the sidewalk and now wants to leave the city. What kind of upside-down world are we in where open defecation on the streets draws a shrug, but the woman who steps in it and dares to complain becomes the villain?

    5.7K1.1K51769121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.1x their median

    Man confronts a Muslim who was throwing rocks mixed with mulch at alligators at Lion Country Safari in Loxahatchee, Florida. https://t.co/j2rc28FqgB

    5.8K1.2K2704671K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.3x their median

    Meet Terry Schanz, chief of staff to Democratic Assemblywoman Tina McKinnor of California. Schanz, who draws a taxpayer-funded salary of roughly $208,000 a year, used work hours to print and distribute flyers confronting independent journalist Nick Shirley. The flyers claimed Shirley has a β€œsmall penis” and challenged him to β€œprove me wrong” with Schanz further demanding to see Shirley’s genitalia as proof. This is the kind of behavior Californians are funding with their tax dollars.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ You know what to do!

    4.1K2.0K1876828K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20265.1x their median

    Just when you thought white progressive women couldn’t stoop any lower, here they are.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ I have just discovered that there is a deranged group of women who are not merely defending Lindsay Clancy. They are actively organizing to elevate and support a woman who deliberately strangled her 3 children. THEEE CHILDREN, ages 5, 3, and 8 months! One is recruiting a group of women to show up at the courthouse during her trial as a show of solidarity. Another is drafting a letter of β€œencouragement,” while yet another says she is more supportive of this child killer than she has ever been of her own friends. That kind of β€œempathy” is not kindness, it’s a death wish for the whole society. White progressive women are a cancer on society!

    4.4K876671117175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.8x their median

    Woman in Munich, Germany, posted a video warning others after a random immigrant tried to open her car door while she was stopped at a traffic light and she also saw him chasing three children. https://t.co/5zrS5hBRnR

    4.3K1.3K1133874K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.8x their median

    BREAKING: Police raided the apartment of Ilhan Omar’s son in Minneapolis and seized firearms and ammunition. Police arrested Omar’s son’s roommate, 22-year-old Abdulrahman Abdi. Earlier that day, the city’s police department said officers conducted a traffic stop and cited Abdi for having no proof of insurance and no driver’s license. Abdi was released at the scene, and the vehicle was being impounded when a firearm was found inside. Officers later tracked Abdi to an address, where they arrested him β€œwithout incident.”

    4.5K90521661108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.2x their median

    WOW! Woman who went all-in supporting Lindsay Clancy now admits that she and her husband sleep in separate rooms after she pressured him to follow the trial. He came away with the complete opposite view of the case. Before this, she was posting about how she couldn’t sleep, terrified of missing any TikTok updates on the trial saying,β€œThe struggle is real.” Looks like her husband finally realized he’s married to an unhinged woman who deeply sympathizes with someone who brutally murdered her own children.

    4.3K49226335107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.2x their median

    BREAKING: Another Latino man has been caught on camera β€œmail fishing” from a public USPS collection box in NYC, attempting to steal checks, credit cards, and other documents containing personal information that could be used to commit fraud or identity theft. If you recognize this thief, please contact the authorities.

    3.3K1.7K752841K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#riseup#flyhigh#soareagles

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 885K followers, an engagement rate of 0.136%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 4.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #riseup, #flyhigh, #soareagles.

What is I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate on X?
I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@ImMeme0) has an engagement rate of 0.136%, based on the median interactions across 91 original posts from the last 30 days against 885,375 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.136%, I Meme Therefore I Am πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ImMeme0 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ImMeme0 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going