ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 engagement report
@ImBreckWorsham - 196K followers on X
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.613%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 73x its own typical post.
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.613%, ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 12% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 17, 202673x their median
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇱 Democrats block President Trump's $2,800,000,000 weapons transfer to Israel, which included 40,000 one-ton bombs.
- Sep 16, 202671x their median
People keep saying Trump term II is the most corrupt administration ever, so I built a model to find out if it was true. I took the UN's definition of corruption, turned it into eight criteria and 100 points, and scored the leaders history remembers for looting their countries: Marcos, Suharto, Mobutu, Abacha, Obiang, Putin. Then I put every president since Eisenhower on the same scale, both parties, with every exoneration counted right alongside the convictions. Nixon scored 41 and no other American President scored over a 25. Trump's second term scored a 91, which ties him with Suharto and Mobutu and puts him above Marcos and Abacha. So he is not only the most corrupt president in American history. At this pace he finishes his term level with the most corrupt rulers of the last hundred years. PSA: don't come in my comments arguing about the results if you haven't read the full article, because ignorance is a choice. Full article is up now on my Substack (link in bio) and it's free.
- Oct 12, 202644x their median
The fact that Omar was raided while not a single Epstein client has ever been should not go unnoticed.
- Sep 15, 202615x their median
Struggle filling up your gas tank today? You'll feel better to know that Trump is sending Israel $2.8 Billion in bombs. Guess who's paying for them?
- Oct 13, 202611x their median
Oh my God.....Stop. 😂🤣😂🤣 I am DEAD. 🤣😂 https://t.co/HO9wBQ6ySt
- Sep 15, 202610x their median
The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation admitted ON RECORD today that his own agents commit bestiality. This is the sickest fucking government in the history of mankind.
- Sep 16, 20269.1x their median
WELL, THAT’S CONVENIENT. Thomas Massie files PRIVILEGED articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth yesterday—meaning the House had to act within two legislative days. So what does Mike Johnson do? SEND THE HOUSE HOME A DAY EARLY. No vote. No debate. No accountability. Just cancel the legislative day and kick the can down the road until AFTER the midterms. You couldn’t write more blatant congressional corruption if you tried.
- Sep 16, 20267.7x their median
Vance puts out video literally BEGGING voters to vote Republican in the midterms: "Give us another chance. Give us another couple of years." This is the equivelant of putting your arm in a cage with a rabid dog and trusting it not to bite you again. The level of desperation at this point is just sad. https://t.co/eA6VGqLT6C
- Oct 13, 20267.6x their median
This is the man who punched a woman in the face at a Trump rally for daring to ask Trump about Epstein from the crowd, as Trump and other attendees cheered him on. Anyone know his name? Let's make him famous. https://t.co/ToUTpaKoeB
- Sep 15, 20267.0x their median
Kash Patel defending FBI agents busted for beastiality and claiming the agents are the actual victims is PEAK Trump's second term.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.613%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 73x its own typical post.
- What is ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
- ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 (@ImBreckWorsham) has an engagement rate of 0.613%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,686 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.613%, ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ImBreckWorsham have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ImBreckWorsham post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.