Back to @IamTheImmortal's profile

Matt Brown engagement report

@IamTheImmortal - 721K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 721K followers
Per impression
1.09%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
4.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
317
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 317 interactions against 721K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 91x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mma, #ufc.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #mma, #ufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Matt Brown's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, Matt Brown sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 27, 202691x their median

    Am I the only one that kinda feels like this Dustin Poirier thing isn’t a big deal? He got drunk and acted dumb, big deal. He should fix his problem yes but this is not a unique problem and he’s a smart guy he’ll get through it for sure.

    6.5K14153422219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202616x their median

    ⚠️DAMN, NOBODY NOTICED THIS?! Islam was STUNNED for a moment. He looked completely gone like his body just shut down for a second. https://t.co/KlRYox7OF5

    4.7K84355553.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.9x their median

    Got a black belt for tapping Sedriques Dumas. Royce Gracie is rolling in his grave. https://t.co/RQ0UmSR269

    2.4K414814389K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.4x their median

    I didn’t mean to announce it but I’m too excited. Making a lot of moves and Immortal Fighting Championship will be official soon. Striking only. No grappling. Muay Thai ruleset basically. Going to fix a lot of the problems you see in combat sports. Gloves, pay structure, etc

    1.2K601041250K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20263.4x their median

    Ilia vs Paddy next? Easiest matchmaking ever right?

    9813452556K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.0x their median

    How about fuck bud light

    5772735434K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.0x their median

    Getting soft in my old age? Man I miss the 90’s music haha. Beautiful tone courtesy of liquifire neck thruPetrucci amp on @NeuralDSP quad cortex. A few slips but I did like 5 takes. I try to make these vids live as possible w/out butchering it. Not bad for a bedroom player imho https://t.co/PF95EjpprB

    5451363625K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.0x their median

    Told you Conor would never fight again!

    5252862436K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    Random thought while on plane: The Great Southern Trendkill was peak Pantera. Don’t expect other metalheads to agree but I die on that hill. Dimebag had his best solos, you could feel Phil’s emotion in every song, best intro of any album ever, production on point… 10/10 album

    343893024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Trying out the Misha plugin from @NeuralDSP what do you guys think of this tone? I love this plugin the precision drive fucking rips! https://t.co/aAEM5E0NEy

    3221032626K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mma#ufc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 317 interactions against 721K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 91x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mma, #ufc.

What is Matt Brown's engagement rate on X?
Matt Brown (@IamTheImmortal) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 721,040 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, Matt Brown sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IamTheImmortal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IamTheImmortal post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going