Back to @IamKrisLondon's profile

Kristopher London engagement report

@IamKrisLondon - 433K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 433K followers
Per impression
0.383%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
57
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 433K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 822x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kristopher London's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Kristopher London sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 90 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 2026822x their median

    That glowing Barca badge is insane bro wtf 😭 https://t.co/Ejl5xcTlY5

    44K2.2K1262101.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026550x their median

    Adrien Broner PRESSES Blueface over $1,000 pool bet and they both argue over the the meaning of "Double or Nothing" 😳 "You really gonna screw up our relationship over $1,000" https://t.co/09vNJ1ujn4

    27K1.1K2.3K1.4K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026375x their median

    Duke Dennis booked a lady for a pedicure, only to ghost her later after she had everything set up for his visit, including a flyer outside her shop💀😂😭 “Watch me set up for a celebrity client just for him to waste my time, money & products” https://t.co/ktXifUJxyZ

    20K4298455608.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026246x their median

    Insane FB Marketplace find https://t.co/S1VD4723UQ

    13K29715373842K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026198x their median

    A man has shared a video of him catching LeBron in a hotel lobby and accused him of being on a fake phone call. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/sRDEXrADXn

    10K3505522132.4M viewsView on X
  • Feb 19, 2024179x their median

    🐐 x 🦒 https://t.co/wwZobglSEu

    10.0K15084151.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026158x their median

    I’ve watched a LOT of shows, but these right here are some of the ones I’d actually tell somebody else to watch 😂🔥 No particular order either. https://t.co/F8v1GQFUol

    7.8K870177155607K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026140x their median

    Michael Jordan and 18-year-old LeBron James together at the 2003 Jordan Brand Capital Classic. This was taken one day after Jordan played the final NBA game of his career. LeBron went for 34 points, 12 rebounds and six assists that night and won MVP. A few months later, he was selected No. 1 overall in the NBA Draft. The framed photo recently surfaced online, with the owner saying both Jordan and LeBron signed it and that authentication paperwork is included.

    7.1K7795245295K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026117x their median

    AJ Brown drop results in a 1-handed INT by Jalyx Hunt https://t.co/ezf0KDyhnS

    6.1K2281981782.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202695x their median

    Been hanging around a lot of GOATs lately https://t.co/ZBJsTdCYHE

    5.3K35282346K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 433K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 822x its own typical post.

What is Kristopher London's engagement rate on X?
Kristopher London (@IamKrisLondon) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 433,114 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Kristopher London sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IamKrisLondon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IamKrisLondon post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going