Independent Women's Voice engagement report
@IWV - 189K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 189K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.984% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 51% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Independent Women's Voice's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Independent Women's Voice sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 51% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 51% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 238 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 6, 2026141x their median
Grab a coffee. ☕️ Let’s talk about Democrats. They say they stand with women. But what happens when you look past the talking points and examine their policies? The truth might be hard to swallow. https://t.co/ISfNmYwVvn
- Oct 1, 202663x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Women’s tennis just SLAMMED THE DOOR SHUT. Every player chasing the 2028 Olympics must now take a ONE-TIME SRY GENE TEST. That gene builds a male body. If you have it… you are OUT. No more testosterone tricks. No more “inclusion” that steals medals from girls who trained their entire lives. No more biological males crushing female athletes and calling it progress. The science is not up for debate. The fairness is not negotiable. Women’s tennis is for WOMEN. Period. They can scream “hate.” They can cry “bigotry.” The wall just went up anyway. This is how you protect women’s sports. Share this if you’re done pretending.
- Sep 16, 202634x their median
BREAKING!!! 🗳️ The U.S. Congress has just passed sweeping Russia-Iran sanctions legislation championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. The bill now heads to President Trump’s desk and is expected to be signed in the coming days.
- Oct 9, 202618x their median
They say they stand with women. But when you look at the policies, a different question emerges: Do Democrats hate women? Decide for yourself. https://t.co/7JkWVMrykv
- Oct 7, 202618x their median
“You were born this way. You don’t need fixing.” That was the promise. So why are gay kids now being asked to question their sex instead of embrace who they are? What happened to just being gay? https://t.co/DtNSuauGoY
- Oct 6, 20269.9x their median
They shut schools, disrupted their normal socialization & education, & then learning fell. Are kids just disposable pawns in the Democrats power games? https://t.co/d0N6djWCyB
- Oct 10, 20265.0x their median
Most Americans probably don’t know this: The Violence Against Women Act was changed in 2013 from protecting women to anyone who "identifies" as a woman. @TheHRHiggins and @carrielukas say the next VAWA reauthorization should change that. https://t.co/S7ytLwzT8S
- Oct 1, 20264.3x their median
“Raising a girl as a girl or a boy as a boy is not child abuse...” Yaeli Martinez was removed from her mother’s custody after her mother declined to treat her as a boy. In state care, Yaeli was affirmed as male and given testosterone. She later died by suicide at 19. Now, @SenEricSchmitt is introducing legislation bearing her name to protect parents from being penalized on those grounds.
- Aug 25, 20262.6x their median
👀 See The ‘Back to the Future’ Scenario Warning Americans About Socialism Read what the @realDailyWire has to say about our latest video on what a future of Democratic Socialism could actually look like ⤵️ https://t.co/EZa4ZdNOYx
- Sep 27, 20262.4x their median
🐺 Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: How Spanberger Buried a Rule to Protect Girls "Spanberger was never a moderate, and nobody paying attention is surprised she killed a rule protecting girls’ private spaces." @DailySignal https://t.co/6Aj8fVl2EA
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 189K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.984% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 51% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.
- What is Independent Women's Voice's engagement rate on X?
- Independent Women's Voice (@IWV) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 188,572 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Independent Women's Voice sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @IWV have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @IWV post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.