Back to @IOHK_Charles's profile

Charles Hoskinson engagement report

@IOHK_Charles - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.093%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
1.87%
53K views on a typical post
Reach
5.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
988
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7.47/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 988 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 1.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cardano, #leiosiscoming, #midnight.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #cardano, #leiosiscoming, #midnight.

Compared with accounts its own size

Charles Hoskinson's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, Charles Hoskinson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 202682x their median

    🚨BREAKING: First gameplay trailer for Holdout Juror Simulator. 11 against 1. Seven days. Can you hold your ground? https://t.co/ULTsCTcWdo

    73K6.9K7134243.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202642x their median

    Internet users have marked Flock CEO Garrett Langley's lawn as a "public toilet" on Google maps https://t.co/15EHfBcfcD

    34K6.5K298210392K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202624x their median

    Muse Spark 1.3 is rolling out today with frontier performance almost too cheap to meter. This is the biggest jump we've made so far on coding and agentic work. Try it in Muse Code and our API. Next up 🍉 and Muse Spark open weights releases coming soon. https://t.co/XQQEDEJGD7

    20K1.6K1.4K1.2K3.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202622x their median

    After six years in stealth, Atomic Machines is out. Our mission: on-demand, universal command of matter. First beachhead: the Matter Compiler, an AI-native manufacturing system that builds working micro-machines from code alone. No per-product tooling. No process development. Different code, different machine.

    18K2.3K7869193.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202620x their median

    EXCLUSIVE: The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial had a history of domestic violence allegations, the NBC10 Boston Investigators have learned through court documents and interviews with family members. Read the full investigation here. https://t.co/qSjIiU8Og8

    4.5K68211K3.3K11M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202617x their median

    49ers owner Jed York allegedly arranged to pay $140 for sex at a trailer park in East Palestine, Ohio. https://t.co/MlMd11Yxqi

    12K1.3K1.6K2.6K8.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202615x their median

    In the U.S. you can get a felony and 6 years in prison for sleeping in your car. For domestic assault, you only get a misdemeanor a maximum of 11 months in prison. For many Americans, a vehicle is the last line of defense against sleeping on the streets. Yet, across the United States, local governments are rapidly enacting ordinances that outlaw vehicle residency and overnight parking. From major hubs like San Francisco and Los Angeles to smaller municipalities like Colorado Springs, local authorities are expanding "camping bans" to target those sleeping in cars and even RVs. These laws carry severe penalties, including steep fines, misdemeanor charges, immediate vehicle impoundment, and sometimes even a felony. For individuals turning to their cars as a temporary safety net, a single citation can trigger a cycle of debt and legal trouble that makes escaping homelessness nearly impossible. The nationwide wave of criminalization has intensified following the landmark 2024 Supreme Court decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, which ruled that penalizing people for sleeping in public does not violate the Eighth Amendment. This ruling gave cities broad authority to enforce camping bans, even in areas with severe shelter shortages. In Tennessee, you can get a Class E felony for sleeping in your car — and up to 6 years in prison. Domestic assault is just a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 11 months in prison. In fact, you can’t be charged with a felony for domestic assault until your THIRD TIME. While municipal leaders argue these measures keep public spaces clean and safe, civil rights advocates warn they criminalize survival. Instead of addressing the systemic shortage of affordable housing, these ordinances penalize working-class Americans who are simply priced out of the rental market. source: American Civil Liberties Union. (2026). Two Years Since Grants Pass: Tracking the Criminalization of Homelessness.

    8.5K4.4K1.0K745413K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202610x their median

    California Simulator: the ending is the most realistic part. 😂 https://t.co/sNBejHwW2g

    8.7K1.1K20088472K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.9x their median

    JUST IN: Trump unveils redesigned U.S. Space Force uniforms. https://t.co/8LHcS2CVvr

    8.1K540794438916K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20269.2x their median

    My mind is blown by how far ahead Apple is with local LLMs. The new Mac Studio M5 Ultra will have a 512 GB model for around 15-20k. You can chain 6 of them together using thunderbolt 5 and this have over 3 TB of ram and a massive amount of CPU and GPU cores. This means you can run a frontier model with over 2 trillion parameters locally for around 100kish. Nivida is around 500k for the same capability.

    8.2K431332691.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cardano#leiosiscoming#midnight#midnightcity#netstars

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 988 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 1.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cardano, #leiosiscoming, #midnight.

What is Charles Hoskinson's engagement rate on X?
Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,059,017 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, Charles Hoskinson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IOHK_Charles have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IOHK_Charles post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going