Back to @IFPI_org's profile

IFPI engagement report

@IFPI_org - 94K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 94K followers
Per impression
0.154%
2.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.154% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 2131x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #musicintheeu, #endstreamingfraud, #ifpifortherecord.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #musicintheeu, #endstreamingfraud, #ifpifortherecord.

Compared with accounts its own size

IFPI's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, IFPI sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link80% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 80% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 237 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 18, 20262131x their median

    Keep Music Sound. End Streaming Fraud. https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/HbHAViEwEG

    4.5K1.7K7890150K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 20261369x their median

    Streaming Fraud. What is it and what can be done to fight it? We can stop streaming fraud if the music community comes together with meaningful and sustained action. https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/SIqmoGh5Dl

    2.8K1.2K5678132K viewsView on X
  • May 19, 2026194x their median

    IFPI CEO Victoria Oakley on what needs to be done to #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/XhdockWa8P https://t.co/ilX9zM4V6e

    362153353338K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 202699x their median

    Here is the Streaming Fraud Sound Check. VERIFY. VET. ACT. SHARE. Companies at every stage of the streaming value chain must take steps to prevent, to detect and then to act on fraud. Stay tuned to hear more about how we can #endstreamingfraud together. https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad https://t.co/V2tDGGOuTj

    203809618K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 202641x their median

    VERIFY. Distributors need to know who is providing content to their services Digital service providers need to verify that accounts are used by real humans who are genuinely engaging with music and not bots. #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad https://t.co/MrqaLJbz1k

    7538722.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202632x their median

    Streaming fraud is happening now and at scale. Find out more about what the industry can do to fight it – and what action has already been taken 👉 https://t.co/CnSTA2WMAp #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/JLBPE4jQpo

    7715416.1K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 202631x their median

    La musique est une fête. Défendons-la. Depuis 44 ans, la Fête de la Musique rassemble la France autour des artistes et de la création. Pourtant, aujourd’hui, les œuvres musicales sont massivement utilisées pour alimenter des systèmes d’IA générative sans que leurs créateurs ne puissent en contrôler l’usage. Oui à l’innovation. Oui à une IA européenne ambitieuse. Mais non à une IA construite au mépris des droits des auteurs, compositeurs, éditeurs, artistes-interprètes et producteurs. À l’occasion de cette Fête de la Musique, l’Adami, la SCPP, le Snep et la Sacem en appellent aux pouvoirs publics pour qu’ils prennent leurs responsabilités face à ce pillage qui ne peut plus durer. Monsieur le Président de la République, Monsieur le Premier ministre, Madame la Ministre de la Culture : il est temps d’agir. ✍️ Rejoignez les 25 000 signataires déjà mobilisés pour protéger la création : https://t.co/Rlc3MixQPF

    6229127.3K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 202628x their median

    VET. Distributors must put in place measures to vet the legitimacy of content before it goes live. The authenticity of both the customer and the content should be regularly reviewed by DSPs and distributors. #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad https://t.co/FpWL0vwwXe

    5526123.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202625x their median

    IFPI today announced the launch of the Streaming Integrity Initiative, a new industry commitment to combat streaming fraud and protect artists, songwriters and fans from its harm. Learn more - https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/2SJuabb8D9

    5320213.5K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 202620x their median

    ACT. Digital service providers should act with first-class measures to be more effective in detecting, shutting down and mitigating the impact of fake plays and suspicious playlists. #endstreamingfraud https://t.co/tWzcGMyOad https://t.co/j53QrNWOYQ

    3815532.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#musicintheeu#endstreamingfraud#ifpifortherecord

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.154% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 2131x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #musicintheeu, #endstreamingfraud, #ifpifortherecord.

What is IFPI's engagement rate on X?
IFPI (@IFPI_org) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, IFPI sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IFPI_org have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IFPI_org post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going