Back to @IFLTV's profile

IFL TV engagement report

@IFLTV - 212K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 212K followers
Per impression
0.294%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
4.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #garciabenn, #whittakerwallace, #boxingnews.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #garciabenn, #whittakerwallace, #boxingnews.

Compared with accounts its own size

IFL TV's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, IFL TV sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video87% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 87% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202666x their median

    Oh no, he only went and uploaded it didn't he @EddieHearn 😬😬😬😬 Things just took a big turn between Eddie Hearn and Dana White... #EddieHearn | #DanaWhite | #BoxingFans | #BoxingWorld https://t.co/cWYg8eorXk

    1.7K1113512130K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202631x their median

    ‼️ HEARN EXPLODES AT DANA... AGAIN ‼️ @eddiehearn goes off on @danawhite again following the Fury vs Joshua press conference 😮 Watch the full interview with Eddie BELOW ⬇️ https://t.co/KnRQ5MbQoD #EddieHearn | #DanaWhite | #FuryJoshua | #BoxingNews https://t.co/0EPU93q2RA

    793354111124K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202622x their median

    “I ACTUALLY CAN’T HELP BUT LIKE THE GUY” After years of back-and-forth on social media, @EddieHearn has spoken out about how he REALLY feels about @Tyson_Fury and revealed how the pair spontaneously met up in Las Vegas 👀 Watch the full interview with Eddie on our YouTube channel BELOW 👇🏼 https://t.co/Fe2o6iONFR #FuryJoshua | #EddieHearn | #TysonFury | #BoxingNews

    5842410258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202619x their median

    “WE’RE GAMBLING THE FUTURE OF OUR COMPANY” @BarryHearn on the ongoing negotiations for Fury vs Joshua 🗣️ Do you think the fight might actually end up at Wembley? Watch our full interview with Barry on our YouTube channel 📺 #FuryJoshua | #BarryHearn https://t.co/YMgnlojZlB

    449453713142K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202613x their median

    ‘ABSOLUTE B*LLOCKS. I’VE SPANKED HIM ALL OVER THE GAFF’ - @eddiehearn responds to Dana White’s latest comments on Fury v AJ ‼️ #boxing #ufc #furyaj #spank https://t.co/tX75vf1toS

    3251819638K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202612x their median

    THE RIGHT HAND THAT DROPPED CONOR BENN 😳 🎬 @Zuffa_Boxing #GarciaBenn | #ConorBenn | #RyanGarcia https://t.co/sbQGk3VdIW

    2604019833K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202611x their median

    "EVEN IF PETER FURY HATED ME, HE'S STILL FAMILY" @Tyson_Fury has squashed Anthony Joshua's claims that his Uncle Peter will be helping him prepare for his fight with Tyson on Dec. 11 😡 🎬 @Tyson_Fury #TysonFury | #FuryJoshua | #PeterFury | #BoxingNews https://t.co/HcazIhaMnF

    25219305117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20269.0x their median

    BILAL FAWAZ THAT IS DEVASTATING 😨 He retains his British and Commonwealth Super-Welterweight Titles with this INSANE stoppage of Eithan James 😮‍💨 A £5k bonus from Uncle Eddie in the bag too 💰 #FawazJames | #WhittakerWallace https://t.co/IyMDjhlSLL

    231174042K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.4x their median

    THIS FIGHT IS OVER ❌ Referee Thomas Taylor waves it off and Ryan Garcia retains his WBC World Welterweight Title 👑 🎬 @Zuffa_Boxing #GarciaBenn https://t.co/bMdhS9Y25e

    14422601049K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20268.3x their median

    Despite his good relationship with Tyson Fury, Tyson's dad John Fury isn't a big fan of Dana White by the looks of it 👀 #TysonFury | #DanaWhite | #JohnFury | #BoxingNews https://t.co/mOUzOWkcfi

    22244124K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#garciabenn#whittakerwallace#boxingnews#boxingfans#furyjoshua

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #garciabenn, #whittakerwallace, #boxingnews.

What is IFL TV's engagement rate on X?
IFL TV (@IFLTV) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 211,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, IFL TV sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IFLTV have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IFLTV post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going