Back to @IBDinvestors's profile

Investors.com engagement report

@IBDinvestors - 457K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 457K followers
Per impression
0.08%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #halloweensale, #ibddigital, #investing.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #halloweensale, #ibddigital, #investing.

Compared with accounts its own size

Investors.com's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Investors.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link90% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 90% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    IBD’s @mwebster1971 says it’s time to channel your inner Ted Lasso and be a goldfish by letting go of past trades fast. With market indicators pointing toward a potential inflection point, investor focus should be on price action, not emotion. Watch to find out which technical indicator Webby is tracking right now. 👇

    4564218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202611x their median

    Find your zen: @Upticken on why you’re probably already ahead of the investing game https://t.co/qgRAf8Qdkr

    4185012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202610x their median

    Don’t miss @markminervini on IBD Live this Wednesday! 📝 Explore new trade ideas for enhanced profits 📈 Receive expert market analysis for well-informed decisions 💡 Identify top-performing stocks effortlessly Secure your spot now: https://t.co/i6I2xYVe45 https://t.co/KTJOAJPZ85

    4046276K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202610x their median

    As the AI market leader, Nvidia is the litmus test for the broader tech sector. IBD’s Mike Webster (@mwebster1971) breaks down $NVDA technicals heading into the weekend and cautions that rather than trying to predict how long the AI theme will last, traders should let the price action speak for itself.

    4541015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202610x their median

    David Ryan talks key characteristics of Model Book stocks. For the full list, check out Tuesday's IBD Live episode. @dryan310 https://t.co/IDM22FNwBX

    4181013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.0x their median

    Which areas of the market is @dryan310 concentrating on right now? Hint: it's not the Nasdaq https://t.co/tkNZN0zKVh

    4122013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 20267.4x their median

    Don’t miss @markminervini on IBD Live this Wednesday! 📝 Explore new trade ideas for enhanced profits 📈 Receive expert market analysis for well-informed decisions 💡 Identify top-performing stocks effortlessly Secure your spot now: https://t.co/ydyaAQGAT7 https://t.co/T4PuyNFF6n

    2842339K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20266.2x their median

    What kills traders more than anything? Tom Basso on overcoming investing FOMO. @basso_tom https://t.co/IhCoVk0yeJ

    215508.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.8x their median

    Broadcom earnings drop tomorrow. As a major semiconductor bellwether, Broadcom’s report will show whether AI hardware can regain momentum or if turbulence continues. @IBD_Alexis explains why. $AVGO https://t.co/NF9T4BlX1P

    1874012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.0x their median

    David Ryan (@dryan310) analyzes notable improvements in top chip stocks: $AMD, $MU, $SMTC, $ARM https://t.co/CEWFcQ7VTf

    194118.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#halloweensale#ibddigital#investing

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57 interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #halloweensale, #ibddigital, #investing.

What is Investors.com's engagement rate on X?
Investors.com (@IBDinvestors) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 456,512 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Investors.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IBDinvestors have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IBDinvestors post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going