Back to @IAPonomarenko's profile

Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ engagement report

@IAPonomarenko - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.195%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
2.73%
83K views on a typical post
Reach
7.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.33/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 83K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mccainmemory, #pokrovsk, #ua.

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #mccainmemory, #pokrovsk, #ua.

Compared with accounts its own size

Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.195%, Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20264.4x their median

    So, itโ€™s confirmed: Oleksii Yukov, who dedicated himself to searching for fallen soldiers on the battlefields and bringing them home, has been awarded the title of Hero of Ukraine. Posthumouslyโ€ฆ https://t.co/vNECrhmWHG

    8.9K844751283K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.1x their median

    Three years since @_juicefighter_ died. We remember. https://t.co/3g3dlroBRe

    8.5K61610719101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.6x their median

    You know, Iโ€™m almost certain that Donald Trump will one day end up with a replica of the Oval Office built for him at Mar-a-Lago, where heโ€™ll spend his days gleefully renaming gulfs and lakes on maps over and over again, imposing astronomical imaginary tariffs on the entire world, savoring imaginary compliments from Putin and Kim Jong Un, drawing dollar bills with his own face on them, throwing darts at portraits of Biden and Obama, and delivering hours-long, incoherent manifestos of self-admiration to nonexistent crowds of adoring fans.

    7.1K70421645178K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.5x their median

    Iโ€™m beginning to suspect that wasting years dragging feet on military aid to Ukraine and playing escalation management games, giving an aggressive militaristic Russia the time and resources to ramp up its war machine to full power against the free world, might not have been the brightest idea.

    6.8K87918725186K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.4x their median

    1. The CIA director unexpectedly flies to Moscow to deliver a message to Putin: Article 5 is ironclad, donโ€™t even think about attacking NATO countries in Europe. 2. Literally two days later, the U.S. deputy secretary of defense comes to NATO headquarters in Brussels and, in softened Machiavellian language, publicly says the following: "Atlantic unity no longer means anything to us. We are leaving, just as we withdrew support for Ukraine. There will be no support or protection in the event of a Russian attack, defend yourselves however you can. Diplomatically, we will call this "Europe taking responsibility for its own conventional defense." So what conclusion about his plans should Putin draw when he sees this?

    6.4K89543438708K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.4x their median

    Glory to the Hero! Junior Lieutenant Vladyslav Polskyi of the 475th Regiment, who recently gained widespread recognition after a remarkable drone video showed him risking his own life to evacuate two of his severely wounded soldiers from the kill zone, was awarded the title of Hero of Ukraine today by presidential decree. Absolute legend.

    6.8K834611396K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.3x their median

    Iโ€™m not implying anything, but over the past five years, CIA directors have made urgent trips either to Russia or to meet personally with Kremlin representatives for two reasons: 1. To try to dissuade Moscow from launching its insane full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 2. To try to dissuade Moscow from using nuclear weapons against Ukraine. And now the CIA director under the Trump administration has made an urgent, unannounced trip to Moscow, apparently to deliver some urgent message to Putin, before leaving again soon.

    6.6K60417929686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.2x their median

    HAPPY UKRAINE'S INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!

    6.6K46556782K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    Let me translate that from the language of the Kremlinโ€™s online bootlickers into plain English: โ€œRussia can no longer defeat Ukraine on its own but it believes the West is stupid enough to voluntarily help it do so with its own hands.โ€ https://t.co/TKBK9b7tH6

    6.0K9161081398K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.6x their median

    In a week, Ukraine will have its fifth Independence Day that, as so many swore, would never come.

    5.4K352452127K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mccainmemory#pokrovsk#ua#ukrainestands

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 83K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mccainmemory, #pokrovsk, #ua.

What is Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's engagement rate on X?
Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@IAPonomarenko) has an engagement rate of 0.195%, based on the median interactions across 69 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,156,119 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.195%, Illia Ponomarenko ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IAPonomarenko have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IAPonomarenko post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going