Back to @IAMTOMMACDONALD's profile

Tom MacDonald engagement report

@IAMTOMMACDONALD - 624K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.949%
of 624K followers
Per impression
12.1%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
7.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.156%
76 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 624K followers, an engagement rate of 0.949%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 12.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 239K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tom MacDonald's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.949%, Tom MacDonald sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 275 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202540x their median

    NEW VIDEO…Rest In Peace Charlie 🙏🏻❤️ https://t.co/WlWHYC583o

    174K52K7.6K5.4K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.1x their median

    We gotta stop calling them “elites” and start calling them “the satanic assholes that eat children and run the world”.

    40K6.9K711159413K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.0x their median

    IF YOU FORCE US TO TAKE DOWN OUR PRIDE FLAGS, WE’LL WALK AWAY FROM TEACHING!

    6.1K26022K1.4K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.3x their median

    Regardless of who killed Charlie or why it was done - one of the primary goals was to shut you up and scare you away from speaking your mind. Never stop.

    17K1.8K22352202K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20263.2x their median

    Remember who you are, Whiteboys 👊🏻🇺🇸 Download Song: https://t.co/zd3Ddxd3ay https://t.co/dfLJJNemLl

    15K3.5K619336879K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.8x their median

    Found out yesterday that my X account is internally flagged for “hate speech” and “violent content”…neither of which accurately describe the things I post. I was also told that it was likely because a large portion of X employees are still Liberal and they see messing with conservatives as “their duty”. So rad, dude.

    14K2.2K859202160K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    😂😂😂 https://t.co/yMRLlIq9Hq

    14K1.7K1023981K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.6x their median

    Being hated by blue-haired gender-fluid retards is a price I’ll gladly pay for not being one of them.

    14K75619334130K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.1x their median

    July 4 Music Video! We Put the US in the USA 🇺🇸 Download the song: https://t.co/47zIkQCMlF https://t.co/rfdFc5KGA7

    9.1K2.6K417194577K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.0x their median

    I had perfect 38th Birthday w/ the people I love 🥳 My life has been a wild ride…the first 20 years were defined by addiction, recklessness and wasted potential…but as I arrive at 38, I’m blown away at how I made the most of the last 15 years. I got sober. I fell in love with my best friend. I chased my dreams and became a musician with sixty number 1’s. I met the President. I retired my Mom. I got my Dad his dream car. I moved my sister and my brother-in-law to America. The list goes on and on. I think the greatest gift I was ever given was the opportunity to be the man God intended I be…and it never would have been possible without the love of my live, my incredible family, my amazing friends and all of YOU. Thank you so much for the birthday wishes…and thank you for being one of the main reasons I have something to celebrate. Love y’all.

    11K57462534135K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 624K followers, an engagement rate of 0.949%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 12.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 239K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Tom MacDonald's engagement rate on X?
Tom MacDonald (@IAMTOMMACDONALD) has an engagement rate of 0.949%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 623,850 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.949%, Tom MacDonald sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IAMTOMMACDONALD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IAMTOMMACDONALD post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going