Back to @Hydraze420's profile

Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ engagement report

@Hydraze420 - 128K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.16%
of 128K followers
Per impression
1.52%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
204
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.16%, Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 18, 202512x their median

    You probably feel like you are way too late to $HYPE. Maybe you use @HyperliquidX but buying the token at these prices just makes you sick. You had so many chances to buy lower. This was me. But I've come to the realisation nothing is going to stop the run to $100+ this cycle. Aped a significant amount to stake this weekend and will keep buying more. A comfy 5X on $100K at $25 will work just fine. Show me the half milly.

    1.4K6697221130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.1x their median

    What if trading could actually pay you? Turn your trading volume into exclusive deals, rewards, and opportunities from leading platforms Think you qualify? Apply now ↓ https://t.co/0l9BBkmzrW https://t.co/BoUumPo7yi

    506272475346K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.5x their median

    Interfold governance is live. $FOLD holders can now take part in network decisions through secret ballots: individual choices remain private while collective results are verifiable, no receipts. The network is putting confidential coordination to work in its own governance. https://t.co/WAKhhxJ2Rw

    352862602628K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.2x their median

    $FAZE flywheel starts now. Launch and trade the right way. https://t.co/iFfUTh8tTh CA: 0x394D38F807eE0027A182216f5e67a15Ae441FA2E https://t.co/8vwOl7lwwe

    5035594993K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.3x their median

    We've partnered with @ground_onchain to power yield on KiiChain. Now enabling: β€’ Multiple Defi and RWA yield vaults now available β€’ Access to Centrifuge, Bitwise, Aave, Morpho, Syrup and more β€’ Multiple yield providers through one integrated experience available With this integration, users can access and manage onchain yield opportunities across multiple providers from one place, from all currencies, with more vaults, assets, and opportunities coming as we continue expanding the KiiChain financial ecosystem.

    216741729125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.7x their median

    Ready for Arena? The line is open. Take your place. Invite four friends. Name your squad. https://t.co/n6tl27hPoY

    15076108716K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Wall Street doesn’t rebuild its markets for a new ledger. It moves when the economics improve. More business from the same assets. Less capital tied up between systems. That’s the opportunity behind Edel: building markets on Canton where institutions can put their portfolios to work without selling what they hold. Brad Klaas built those economics in securities lending and prime brokerage, now we're building the economics that make institutions move.

    1895015817K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Surely Michael Mmoh is too good to lose a set today against Maloney. $1K > $10K challenge starts here, let's COOK. Giving away $200 to some people who sign up to REELS below πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/pmiO6MrdlD

    1662164216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Finally broke 80 this week ⛳️ First time ever. Shot 79 in a competition. Yearly goal complete. https://t.co/fK1K1eQAKD

    216531013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Only posted a few times on Binance Square since I started using this week & have less than 1,000 followers still. But the reach is insane. 71K views on this post in less than 24hrs. Wild. https://t.co/1NRJM4jcoZ

    204817014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 128K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ's engagement rate on X?
Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ (@Hydraze420) has an engagement rate of 0.16%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 127,675 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.16%, Hydraze πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Hydraze420 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Hydraze420 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going