Back to @HustleBitch_'s profile

HustleBitch engagement report

@HustleBitch_ - 394K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.232%
of 394K followers
Per impression
2.42%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
9.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
890
interactions (median)
Saved
0.456%
168 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 890 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.232%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 2.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

HustleBitch's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.232%, HustleBitch sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1015 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 12, 202592x their median

    🚨 WATCH HER FACE CLOSELY 🚨 The moment the reporter brings up Candace Owens, Erika Kirk’s entire expression shifts instantly. What does her face tell you? https://t.co/sAtSzOEIIr

    65K6.2K8.4K2.5K27M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202627x their median

    🚨 THEY WARNED YOU NOT TO DRINK RAINWATER — THEN THIS WOMAN TESTED IT AGAINST HER TAP WATER They tell you rainwater can be contaminated. Don’t collect it. It's not safe to drink. Then this woman pulled out a meter and compared fresh rainwater with the water coming straight into her home. The rainwater? So clean it registers at 1 PPM. Then she sticks the exact same meter under her tap: 554 PPM. Watching rainwater barely move the meter while her tap sends the number soaring has people online losing it: “So the water falling from the sky is the problem... but 554 coming out of the faucet is totally fine? 😂” “I want to know exactly what the hell is coming through those pipes” What do you think they're not telling us about the water being pumped into our homes?

    17K6.7K494191761K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202622x their median

    🚨 AMERICANS ARE PISSED AFTER FINDING OUT WHAT’S REALLY INSIDE OREO COOKIES An Oreo customer pulled apart a Double Stuf and noticed the filling didn’t even reach the edges. So she squished it down and suddenly that supposedly “DOUBLE STUF” filling looked like a regular Oreo. Then people started digging into what’s actually inside these cookies. Oreo just released Zero Sugar cookies, swapping out real sugar for a blend of maltitol, polydextrose, sucralose and Ace-K. These are synthetic or processed sweetening ingredients that critics have raised concerns about causing cancer as well as potential gut and metabolic effects. Then there’s the resurfaced video that makes the whole thing look even crazier. A guy blasts regular Oreos with a full blowtorch. The cookies appear extremely resistant to igniting. They don’t melt into oblivion. They just sit there taking direct flame like some kind of heat resistant construction material. Meanwhile, Oreo responded to another viral complaint by asking the customer to DM them so they could “take a closer look,” while commenters accused the company of shrinkflation. One comment absolutely buried them: “Y’all haven’t double stuffed anything but your wallets.” Now they want you buying a zero sugar version loaded with even more alternative and questionable ingredients replacing the sugar. If these things can survive a BLOWTORCH and the ingredient list keeps getting longer… what the hell is REALLY inside an Oreo?

    16K2.1K740110597K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202620x their median

    🚨 NEPAL WASN’T A FLOOD — IT WAS AN EXTINCTION EVENT Entire streets gone. Villages erased. Water moving like a wall. People are saying it does not look like weather. It looks like a reset. The missing person number is what turned the comments radioactive. First it was just over a thousand. Then local reports started circulating that more than 12,000 people had been listed as missing through a government app families were using to report loved ones who vanished. A lot of people immediately accused officials of hiding the real death toll so the world would not panic. Then came the pile-on. A mass coronal ejection from the sun. A Himalayan glacier break sending a hundred foot wall of water through cities. A lunar eclipse the same night. Now rescue work in parts of Nepal has been suspended after a landslide dam burst and police told people to get out. So the internet’s question is no longer “how bad was the flood?” It’s why all of this is happening at once... and whether the official count is even close to the truth. Are these just stacked disasters in a brutal week… or is the death toll being kept quiet because the real number would cause chaos?

    14K3.7K676168597K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202617x their median

    🚨 FORMER HEALTHCARE CEO GOES VIRAL EXPOSING WHAT AMERICANS FEED THEIR KIDS — NOW PEOPLE ARE WORRIED ABOUT HIS SAFETY He starts pulling apart foods millions of Americans, including children, eat every single day. Pork. Cheese. Frozen desserts. Then he starts naming ingredients and production methods he claims most Americans have absolutely no idea they’re consuming. He says the same system Americans trust to approve medicines is also allowing things into the food supply that he says he refuses to put in his own body. Then he reveals his background: “I used to be a CEO, a former healthcare administrator.” “I can go get a $300,000 to $500,000-a-year job again to poison you… but I found a soul.” Now the clip is exploding online and people are saying they’re worried about his safety after hearing what he’s willing to say publicly. If this stuff is really safe, why don’t other countries want it in their food?

    10K4.5K189136232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202616x their median

    🚨 AMERICAN WOMAN SHOWS WHAT FRUIT LOOKS LIKE IN EUROPE — THEN REALIZES SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG BACK HOME An American woman eating fruit in Europe noticed something we've almost stopped seeing back home. Seeds. Grapes with seeds. Watermelons with seeds. A seed isn't just something annoying you spit out. It's the one part of your food capable of creating more food. So what happens when they slowly remove it from everything? “Seedless” was never just about convenience. Make the food unable to reproduce. Make people dependent on suppliers. Turn something humans have grown for thousands of years into something you have to keep buying. And eventually, whoever controls the supply controls what ends up on your table. Did they really remove the seeds for our convenience... or did we just become dependent on a food system we don't control?

    10K3.8K272160479K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202615x their median

    🚨 JOE ROGAN’S “SCARIEST EPISODE YET” — HIS GUEST JUST BLEW THE LID OFF WHY SO MANY PEOPLE UNDER 50 ARE GETTING SICK Joe Rogan’s guest Dr. Zach Bush just went down a disturbing rabbit hole about what he believes is happening to human health. And he says gluten isn’t the real problem. Bush points directly at glyphosate, arguing that what people call gluten sensitivity can actually be part of a much bigger metabolic breakdown. His words: “We don’t have gluten sensitivity. We have a metabolic collapse that’s called glyphosate poisoning.” Then it gets darker. Bush argues that chemical exposure is connected to rising allergies, autoimmune disease and neurological conditions... and says the damage eventually reaches fertility itself. Then the conversation turns to pesticides and PFAS “forever chemicals” entering the food supply, substances that can persist in the environment and human body for years. If this many people are getting sick before 50, what the hell are we being exposed to every single day?

    10.0K3.1K213115649K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202613x their median

    🚨 THIS PEDIATRICIAN JUST ADMITTED INSURANCE COMPANIES PAY DOCTORS $2,500 PER KID TO VACCINATE — AND PARENTS ARE LOSING IT Dr. Bob Sears went on camera and said the thing that made the comments explode: YES, pediatricians get money tied to vaccinating. Then he dropped the number. He said a major insurance company pays a $2,500 bonus for every child who falls behind on shots and gets caught up by age two and a half. In a busy practice, he said that can turn into tens of thousands, even hundreds of thousands of extra dollars. His question was simple. Where is that money coming from? Insurance companies already deny a huge share of claims. Now people are asking why there is a pile of cash sitting there to push a schedule. Sears framed it as income, not medicine. Do you still trust a pediatrician after hearing about a $2,500 bonus per vaccinated kid?

    6.6K4.5K175155102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202612x their median

    🚨 MOM HEARS HER KIDS TOY PHONE ASKING “WHERE DO YOU LIVE?” — WHAT SHE FOUND INSIDE IS TERRIFYING “Where do you live?” “How old are you?” “What time do you go to school?” “How many people are in your family?” This mom says the phones she purchased off TikTok shop suddenly started talking by themselves while her twins were asleep. She smashed them open. Inside? SIM CARDS. She says none of those voices had played while her babies were pressing the buttons all day. So who... or WHAT... was asking the questions? Would you ever let your child touch another internet connected toy after seeing this?

    7.6K2.7K405190177K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202612x their median

    🚨 MCDONALD’S JUST ADMITTED THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT’S HAPPENING TO THEIR OWN FOOD — AND THE INTERNET IS GOING CRAZY A guy noticed a bizarre spot on his McDonald’s bun and posted it online because he genuinely wanted to know what the hell it was. Then McDonald’s showed up in the comments. Their response? “Ran to the comments because idk either” That’s when people lost it. Because if McDonald’s doesn’t know what’s happening to its own food, who the hell does? Another man has been documenting a McDonald’s cheeseburger for 515 DAYS and says it still hasn’t visibly rotted or molded. The original receipt sitting next to it has literally deteriorated more than the burger itself. He also has a 119-day-old Quarter Pounder that still appears largely intact and a 25-day-old McChicken sandwich where the lettuce is visibly deteriorating while the chicken patty barely seems to have changed. If McDonald’s can’t even explain what’s happening to its own food, why the hell are millions of people still eating it without asking questions?

    7.4K2.6K501134870K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 890 interactions against 394K followers, an engagement rate of 0.232%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 2.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 92x its own typical post.

What is HustleBitch's engagement rate on X?
HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) has an engagement rate of 0.232%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 394,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.232%, HustleBitch sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HustleBitch_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HustleBitch_ post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going