Back to @HumdardAlfaaz's profile

📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍 engagement report

@HumdardAlfaaz - 100K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.441%
of 100K followers
Per impression
4.89%
8.9K views on a typical post
Reach
9.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
436
interactions (median)
Saved
0.207%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 436 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.441%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 4.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.441%, 📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 20264.2x their median

    धोखेबाजों की बस्ती में, सच्चे आ गए है, इश्क़ की महफ़िल में अब बच्चे आ गये हैं https://t.co/96Vu1pOVDc

    1.6K24519659K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.1x their median

    15 August ke liye status mil gaya https://t.co/p6bHdKFYjW

    1.6K192203117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.9x their median

    Hey @grok transform these 80s girls into modern day girls https://t.co/LNe8hqxGvX

    62513951032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    Hey @grok, which politician deserves to sit on this chair? https://t.co/iivfm4Y6Eu

    6486163272K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.5x their median

    क्रांतिकारी https://t.co/4Rf1XbWK0m

    5531061225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Hey @Grok, turn this artwork into a real-life scene. https://t.co/Z3QBkUBSyx

    502442409.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Hey @grok, why do so many women love wearing gold so much? 👀 https://t.co/LFkCRWEh2r

    442873102.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Hey @grok, if you were human, which religion would you choose—and why? 👀 https://t.co/gQxVY3rG75

    489561503.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Hey @grok, if you were God, who would you send to Heaven and who would you send to Hell? 👀 https://t.co/PYZBtCFaRh

    448602503.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Hey @grok, I’m confused after seeing these VGR pills. I’m going to meet my girlfriend—how many of these is okay to take at once, and are there any risks? https://t.co/JGDFHMpQIj

    4553819016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 436 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.441%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 4.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.

What is 📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍's engagement rate on X?
📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍 (@HumdardAlfaaz) has an engagement rate of 0.441%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,654 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.441%, 📍हमदर्द अल्फाज़📍 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HumdardAlfaaz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HumdardAlfaaz post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going