Back to @HumanosRaw's profile

Humanos engagement report

@HumanosRaw - 367K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 367K followers
Per impression
0.263%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 2224x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Humanos's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Humanos sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,672 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,672 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 20262224x their median

    La chica que acosaba al niño silencioso y tranquilo de la escuela recibió el merecido de una manera que no esperaba... https://t.co/xthlHmjipN

    64K3.9K3.1K4014.8M viewsView on X
  • Mar 19, 2026429x their median

    💀🔴ÚLTIMA HORA: El portaaviones francés Charles de Gaulle fue localizado por periodistas de Le Monde gracias a... la aplicación deportiva Strava de un oficial que estaba corriendo en la cubierta del barco. https://t.co/5MruDOIgHQ

    12K1.1K1782441.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026130x their median

    Imágenes captadas por los paparazzi muestran a la princesa Diana en la residencia privada del embajador británico en El Cairo junto a su escolta, Ken Wharfe, durante su visita a Egipto en mayo de 1992. https://t.co/o4IsCoMtbv

    4.0K1174111.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026122x their median

    Imagina el grado de conmoción psicológica que está sufriendo el dueño del coche en este momento. https://t.co/WqwPjp9diB

    3.8K126146952K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202618x their median

    Ya le había lanzado el pastel en la cara en el quinto señalito que hizo con la mano, lo juro. https://t.co/AjnxZZHtAL

    560208197K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202615x their median

    Muchos jóvenes se provocan traumatismos a propósito para conseguir la famosa oreja de coliflor, un rasgo típico en luchadores por fricción constante. Una practica peligrosa que puede causar infecciones severas y deformidades permanentes 🥊 https://t.co/Mjc1UkEOMl

    477550137K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202615x their median

    Hacer un salto mortal hacia atrás en plena cancha de tenis no es algo que se vea todos los días. https://t.co/YDfAjNSst2

    4571910104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.0x their median

    Iba a reaccionar molesto, pero todo su ánimo cambió al instante en que se dio cuenta de quién se trataba. La demostración de empatía y cariño que demuestra lo poderoso que es el afecto genuino 🥺❤️ https://t.co/PKHKVEqhIU

    28340112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.0x their median

    Intentó salir del agua con 😅 elegancia pero el muelle tenía otros planes para su traje de baño. Un accidente playero digno de recordar. https://t.co/GBvqh8baCE

    15720024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.9x their median

    Por eso es importante dejar que los niños se aburran.🏴‍☠️ https://t.co/xFFN1m64cy

    107180013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 2224x its own typical post.

What is Humanos's engagement rate on X?
Humanos (@HumanosRaw) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 367,463 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Humanos sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,672 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HumanosRaw have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HumanosRaw post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going