Back to @HuXijin_GT's profile

Hu Xijin 胡锡进 engagement report

@HuXijin_GT - 582K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 582K followers
Per impression
0.393%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
4.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 582K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 246x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hu Xijin 胡锡进's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Hu Xijin 胡锡进 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 369 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 2026246x their median

    BREAKING: President Trump reveals the details of his conversation with FIFA President Gianni Infantino over the controversial red card call on star American player Folarin Balogun. "All I did was ask for a review because I didn't think it was a foul. And, you know, again, I'm good at this stuff. I didn't think it was a foul. I thought it was two great athletes that crashed into each other and got entangled." "I think they made a really brilliant decision. I think the referee's call was horrible and nobody talks about that. They talk about the red card like it's fine, nobody talks the referee's decision to red card."

    18K3.1K4.9K1.8K6.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202633x their median

    From my perspective as a Chinese media professional, Venezuela has been openly robbed by the United States. Venezuela was forced to submit, probably because Latin America is relatively weak and closer to the US. President Trump wanted to do the same to Iran, seizing Iranian oil, but encountered fierce resistance.

    2.2K55322237148K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20267.7x their median

    China is not pursuing geopolitics in Brazil, but mutually beneficial cooperation. So if Brazil undergoes another party rotation, I believe the new government will, on the whole, continue the previous administration’s approach to economic cooperation with China, because that better serves Brazil’s interests. China is Brazil’s largest trading partner, and the United States cannot offer Brazil the benefits it obtains from China. For example, the United States cannot absorb the volume of ore that China buys from Brazil, and in agricultural exports to China, the United States and Brazil are fierce competitors.

    60045491473K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.3x their median

    The United States has opened Pandora's box in space. China has consistently opposed the militarization of outer space; however, if the U.S. persists in its course and continues to deploy in-orbit weapons, it would be nearly impossible for China and Russia to avoid taking reciprocal actions. https://t.co/9yfnKGhZW3

    349152681354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.3x their median

    The Philippine boat is so arrogant, yet so unprofessional. This small boat’s behavior is a microcosm of the Philippines’ constant provocations against China in the South China Sea. https://t.co/JPX2s1InED

    234291231168K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20264.1x their median

    China has shown considerable restraint in the South China Sea. Just imagine what would happen if China treated the Philippines the way the US has treated Iran or Venezuela. So far, China has responded to provocations by Philippine vessels with water cannons. https://t.co/fUa5Bpu0MD

    24417113234K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.8x their median

    China, which possesses aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, and destroyers, sent a small coast guard boat to deal with Philippine soldiers. In our hands we are holding sticks — exactly the same as the sticks they are holding. https://t.co/x65ZXb6RwD

    22814901462K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.2x their median

    The EU has cut ties with Russia and is in an awkward relationship with the United States. If it also falls out with China, it would truly become an eccentric, narcissistic old maid. Frankly, China hopes to maintain normal trade relations with Europe. But if a full-scale trade war is unavoidable, China is far stronger than the EU both in the cards it holds and in its capacity to endure.

    2062856755K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.2x their median

    From my perspective as a Chinese person, Amodei wants more than just to adjust the breakneck pace of AI development for the sake of safety; he also wants to ensure that he and U.S. companies determine the speed of progress at the AI ​​frontier, effectively positioning the U.S. as the unilateral rule-maker.

    20124611036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    The Gyirong Port between China and Nepal was suddenly struck by a devastating mudslide. Both the Chinese and Nepalese sides suffered heavy losses. On the Chinese side, 3 people have been confirmed dead and 265 remain missing. The port lies in the Gyirong Gorge, a deep canyon in the Himalayas, and has served as an ancient trade route between China and Nepal for a thousand years. This is one of the most severe geological disasters China has faced in recent years.

    2022633344K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 582K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 246x its own typical post.

What is Hu Xijin 胡锡进's engagement rate on X?
Hu Xijin 胡锡进 (@HuXijin_GT) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 582,454 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Hu Xijin 胡锡进 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HuXijin_GT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HuXijin_GT post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going