Dr.Wang engagement report
@HotmailfromSH - 167K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 167K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.695% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 379 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ebola, #paris.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #ebola, #paris.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr.Wang's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.042%, Dr.Wang sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 75% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 11, 20265.4x their median
大家好!这是我爱人刚做的新YouTube频道,记录我们的旅居、旅行&生活点滴 欢迎大家来看看。 如果喜欢的话,请帮我们点个赞、订阅。刚起步需要大家的鼓励,也非常期待听到大家的宝贵意见与建议。 https://t.co/VtTjO6ZTNM
- Sep 13, 20265.0x their median
「医学科普:脑出血是如何发生的 普通人该如何预防?」 敬一丹老师,因急性脑出血去世,R.I.P。今天看到这个消息,非常的悲伤!在我上学期间还读过一丹老师的书。她的女儿发布讣告称:敬一丹今年6月在哈尔滨突发急性脑出血,病情较重随后转回北京治疗,经过近3个月的治疗,最终还是没能挺过来…… 从我们医学科普的角度,讲讲急性脑出血是怎么发生的? 很多人第一反应是摔倒或者撞到了头?其实,外伤导致的颅内出血和我们通常说的“自发性脑出血”并不是一回事儿,我们之前也科普过区别。 对于没有明显外伤的脑出血,最重要的危险因素之一就是高血压。 血压长期偏高,相当于脑内的小血管长期承受较大的压力。时间久了,血管壁会发生结构性损伤和退变,尤其是脑内小动脉越来越脆弱。当血压控制不好、出现明显波动时,就有可能发生血管破裂,血液进入脑组织。 脑组织对出血非常敏感。出血以后,不仅会直接损伤周围脑组织,形成的血肿还会压迫正常脑组织,甚至引起脑水肿、颅内压升高。 所以有的人会突然出现一侧肢体无力、嘴角歪斜、说话含糊、意识障碍,甚至突然昏迷。 除了高血压之外还有一些其他原因,譬如脑动脉瘤——可以理解成血管壁局部鼓出了一个“包”,一旦破裂比较典型的是发生蛛网膜下腔出血。 还有脑动静脉畸形等脑血管结构异常,血管本身的结构就和正常血管不同,也有可能发生出血。 另外,随着年龄增长脑淀粉样血管病也是老年人脑出血的重要原因之一;某些抗凝药物、凝血功能异常等,也可能会增加出血风险。 那么,我们普通人最应该做什么?其实最重要的事情反而很朴素:把自己的血压管理好! 定期测量血压,发现高血压以后规范治疗,不要因为“没有感觉”就擅自停药。高血压本身往往没有明显症状,但它对脑、心脏、肾脏和血管的长期损伤却一直存在。 至于脑动脉瘤、脑血管畸形,并不是所有人都需要进行筛查。如果存在相关症状、明确家族史,或者医生根据具体情况认为有必要,可以进一步选择MRA、CTA等脑血管影像检查;DSA则主要用于需要进一步明确血管病变或进行介入治疗评估的情况。 如果日常突然出现剧烈头痛、口角歪斜、说话不清、一侧肢体无力、意识异常,千万不要等。无论是不是脑出血,都应该立即呼叫急救。 脑卒中抢救,拼的就是时间!
- Oct 21, 20264.3x their median
“决定一个家庭幸福的原因,不是贫穷或富有,不是健康或疾病,而是我们与家人相处时的态度,是我们向家人所展露的情绪或脾气。” 拥有不同情绪价值的家庭,往往有着不同的命运走向。遇事不指责,凡事多包容,这就是一个家庭幸福和谐的底层逻辑。 https://t.co/cg2u1vOYTh
- Sep 20, 20263.5x their median
经济上行期是一种感觉 ? 90年代,经济上升期的松弛感。 Credit by:「收集老照片」 https://t.co/jJxUeh0DcE
- Sep 14, 20263.2x their median
“人,不走出去,家就是你的世界;走出去,世界就是你的家。” 找寻自我的过程不会一蹴而就,有的人还没开始,有的人在继续,有的人放弃了,而有的人正在路上...... https://t.co/OlHpEm2mPl
- Sep 17, 20263.2x their median
有一种边界感叫「学会拒绝」。 敢于拒绝的人心理更强大,不会拒绝又害怕被人拒绝在心理学上叫做“被拒敏感”。 能在社交中勇敢说“不”是心理成熟的表现。不论是拒绝别人,还是承受别人的拒绝,都需要自信&勇气。 害怕拒绝的人,要先处理好自己的心结,譬如放弃讨好他人,不必总是对他人有亏欠心理等。 另外,要树立边界感,不用过度参与也不必背上全责,量力而行、提出建设性建议即可。 总之,多关注自身的需求与感受,不要跟任何人走得太近...... 要明白:近则不恭。
- Sep 13, 20263.2x their median
推荐这部泰国奈飞剧「绝庙骗局」,已出了两季。看似受人尊敬的宗教场所背后不为人知的故事…… “信仰在哪,钱就在哪!” https://t.co/embK7DJH3C
- Sep 13, 20263.2x their median
你永远可以相信Lonely Planet! 越南归仁(Quy Nhon)被评为2026年全球最具吸引力的25大海滨旅游目的地之一。 https://t.co/2DyaDzvlSX
- Oct 17, 20262.8x their median
补牙~ 很多人以为牙医手里那把会发蓝光的“枪”是紫外线消毒灯,但它其实是高强度的蓝光(波长约450-470纳米)。 填充的树脂材料中含有光引发剂,受到这种特定波长的蓝光照射后,会在短短几秒钟内发生聚合反应,从而迅速硬化。 https://t.co/8aNeSWEN4f
- Oct 18, 20262.7x their median
法国是我去过最多城市的欧洲国家,巴黎、里昂、马赛、雷恩&尼斯……几乎走遍了各大城市。 今早看到新闻里那些熟悉的街道、历史悠久的市政建築和店铺被大火和暴力破坏成这个样子,真的无比痛心。无论诉求是什么,暴力和纵火、打砸抢绝对不是解决问题的方法。 谴责任何破坏公物和家园的暴力行为!💔🇫🇷
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 167K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.695% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 379 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ebola, #paris.
- What is Dr.Wang's engagement rate on X?
- Dr.Wang (@HotmailfromSH) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 167,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.042%, Dr.Wang sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HotmailfromSH have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HotmailfromSH post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.