Back to @HoodieAllen's profile

Hoodie Allen engagement report

@HoodieAllen - 898K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 898K followers
Per impression
0.138%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
3.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
44
interactions (median)
Saved
0.002%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 898K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.138% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 498x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hoodie Allen's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Hoodie Allen sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 10, 2026498x their median

    Wu-Tang Clan will perform at Knicks-Spurs NBA Finals Game 4 halftime show https://t.co/SqrddAEaBI https://t.co/VRHt9DO7uJ

    18K2.2K4411.2K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 21, 2026181x their median

    Been playing MW2 the last few weeks and decided to put all my clips together and drop a montage in 2026.. enjoy 🫡 https://t.co/zrSxqcldxl

    16K1.4K5651831.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 202663x their median

    OG Anunoby in the Finals: 23.8 PPG 4.0 RPG 3.8 3PM 58/56/92% The most efficient 20-PPG Finals series by a player in NBA HISTORY (78.4% TS). https://t.co/dnCBdBd3Mz

    13K1.6K112505633K viewsView on X
  • Dec 28, 2025207x their median

    thank you @fazeclan for letting me be the tiniest musical part of all of those early videos. the impact felt a decade later is something i never could have imagined

    8.5K33717143466K viewsView on X
  • Jan 17, 2026139x their median

    Hoodie Allen has arrived. 👍 https://t.co/hYTfjz5tQD

    5.6K31313363415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202674x their median

    i got a fake id and a checklist https://t.co/xG7J3AmLnW

    2.9K2348940611K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202639x their median

    brakence is a generational artist

    1.5K14723935K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 202630x their median

    a label advance is not a loan its literally advancing the money theyve predicted you might make back

    1.2K432446169K viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 202629x their median

    happy bday https://t.co/6qHsAG3Hbq

    1.2K5739833K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202625x their median

    excellent thrift store find @FaZeClan https://t.co/UU2J1ECT93

    1.0K3522364K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 898K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.138% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 498x its own typical post.

What is Hoodie Allen's engagement rate on X?
Hoodie Allen (@HoodieAllen) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 898,097 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Hoodie Allen sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HoodieAllen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HoodieAllen post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going