Back to @HombresSexxys's profile

Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘ engagement report

@HombresSexxys - 238K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.338%
of 238K followers
Per impression
2.23%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
15.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
796
interactions (median)
Saved
0.626%
224 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 796 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.338%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cruising, #orgΓ­a, #π—©π—œπ—˜π—₯π—‘π—˜π—¦.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #cruising, #orgΓ­a, #π—©π—œπ—˜π—₯π—‘π—˜π—¦.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘'s engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.338%, Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘ sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 13, 202669x their median

    ΒΏQuΓ© les dan a los niΓ±os de hoy en dΓ­a que salen con esas tremendas vergas enormes? 🀀πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ’¦ (yo le hubiera sacado la leche πŸ’¦) https://t.co/36wAFhpAnw

    51K4.4K60181.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202627x their median

    QuΓ© delicia Naim, un modelo precioso con ese chimbo sΓΊper grande y grueso uffff 🀀πŸ₯΅πŸ”₯πŸ†βš‘οΈπŸ’― https://t.co/GDVvaxz5me

    19K2.6K1713258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202619x their median

    A este pasivo le llegΓ³ un domiciliario muy vergΓ³n que en cuestiΓ³n de minutos tenΓ­a su chimbo adentro de ese culo rosado delicioso. Exquisitos se ven juntos dando duro y aguantando full las embestidas πŸ₯΅πŸ†πŸ’¦πŸ‘πŸ’₯ https://t.co/Nx1CKF4rxL

    13K2.3K1210183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202615x their median

    ΒΏSe acuerdan el papasito vergΓ³n que les presentΓ© hace unos dΓ­as? Miren la vergota que tiene y como coge de rico ufff πŸ€€πŸ’―πŸ†πŸ’¦ https://t.co/8bWaASdHHX

    10K1.8K98211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202614x their median

    Ellos preguntaron por el hermano pero no estaba, sin embargo resultaron muy bien atendidos a punta de una verga enorme y gruesa y un Papasito que se los comiΓ³ a los dos πŸ‘πŸ†πŸ‘πŸ’¦πŸ’― https://t.co/a6cr0b9q9q

    9.6K1.4K85154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202613x their median

    QuΓ© chimba de flaco, mono, sΓΊper mega vergΓ³n. Que delicia como le da chimbo ufff πŸ€€πŸ†πŸ”₯πŸ’¦ DelΓ©itense πŸ’ͺπŸΌβš‘οΈπŸ’― https://t.co/1FyKJqGOlt

    9.0K1.2K196143K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202612x their median

    Me encanta cuando el activo se arrecha al extremo y penetra al pasivo asΓ­, sin piedad, se lo metiΓ³ todo hasta el fondo πŸ€€πŸ†πŸ‘πŸ’¦πŸ”₯ https://t.co/QZopuiTLAV

    8.3K1.4K135121K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202612x their median

    Comenzaron besΓ‘ndose y dΓ‘ndose besitos por todo el cuerpo, pero terminaron con una follada brutal. Ese moreno le metiΓ³ ese chimbote por ese ano rosadito. Brutalmente deliciosos πŸ€€πŸ†πŸ”₯πŸ‘πŸ’¦ https://t.co/uvFDNH7m8O

    7.9K1.7K1310125K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20269.5x their median

    Que. Himnos como me fΓ­o de duro y le aguantΓ³ verga full 🀀πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ’₯πŸ’―πŸ‘ https://t.co/AunOdFgFOe

    6.8K79720106K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20267.0x their median

    ΒΏQuiΓ©n sabe quiΓ©n es este machote nea Papasito? Ufff delicioso πŸ”₯πŸ€€πŸ†πŸ¦ΆπŸΌβš‘οΈπŸ‘… https://t.co/SGBaWIlVP2

    4.8K796161132K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cruising#orgΓ­a#π—©π—œπ—˜π—₯π—‘π—˜π—¦

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 796 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.338%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cruising, #orgΓ­a, #π—©π—œπ—˜π—₯π—‘π—˜π—¦.

What is Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘'s engagement rate on X?
Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘ (@HombresSexxys) has an engagement rate of 0.338%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 238,020 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.338%, Hombres Sexys πŸ”₯πŸ†πŸ‘ sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HombresSexxys have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HombresSexxys post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going